Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35548436›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2022

A Sensorless Modular Multiobjective Control Algorithm for Left Ventricular Assist Devices: A Clinical Pilot Study.

Martin Maw, Thomas Schlöglhofer, Christiane Marko, Philipp Aigner, Christoph Gross, Gregor Widhalm, Anne-Kristin Schaefer, Michael Schima, Franziska Wittmann, Dominik Wiedemann and 5 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04786236 (Pilot Study for the Evaluation of Control Algorithms for Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices Based on Physiological Demand), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04786236 naterminatednot on this map

Pilot Study for the Evaluation of Control Algorithms for Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices Based on Physiological Demand

TypeinterventionalSponsorHeinrich SchimaRan2020 to 2021Enrolled7ConditionsHeart FailureArmsPhysiological Control Module for the Medtronic -"HVAD" Left Ventricular Assist Device
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. AnFrontiers in physiology · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Martin MawCenter for Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Thomas SchlöglhoferCenter for Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Christiane MarkoDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Philipp AignerCenter for Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Christoph GrossDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Gregor WidhalmCenter for Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Anne-Kristin SchaeferDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Michael SchimaCenter for Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Franziska WittmannDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Dominik WiedemannDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Francesco MoscatoCenter for Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
D'Anne KudlikMedtronic plc, Minneapolis, MN, United States.
Robert StadlerMedtronic plc, Minneapolis, MN, United States.
Daniel ZimpferDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Heinrich SchimaCenter for Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Medical University of Vienna · ATMedtronic (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Contemporary Left Ventricular Assist Devices (LVADs) mainly operate at a constant speed, only insufficiently adapting to changes in patient demand. Automatic physiological speed control promises tighter integration of the LVAD into patient physiology, increasing the level of support during activity and decreasing support when it is excessive. Methods: A sensorless modular control algorithm was developed for a centrifugal LVAD (HVAD, Medtronic plc, MN, USA). It consists of a heart rate-, a pulsatility-, a suction reaction-and a supervisor module. These modules were embedded into a safe testing environment and investigated in a single-center, blinded, crossover, clinical pilot trial (clinicaltrials.gov, NCT04786236). Patients completed a protocol consisting of orthostatic changes, Valsalva maneuver and submaximal bicycle ergometry in constant speed and physiological control mode in randomized sequence. Endpoints for the study were reduction of suction burden, adequate pump speed and flowrate adaptations of the control algorithm for each protocol item and no necessity for intervention via the hardware safety systems. Results: A total of six patients (median age 53.5, 100% male) completed 13 tests in the intermediate care unit or in an outpatient setting, without necessity for intervention during control mode operation. Physiological control reduced speed and flowrate during patient rest, in sitting by a median of -75 [Interquartile Range (IQR): -137, 65] rpm and in supine position by -130 [-150, 30] rpm, thereby reducing suction burden in scenarios prone to overpumping in most tests [0 [-10, 2] Suction events/minute] in orthostatic upwards transitions and by -2 [-6, 0] Suction events/min in Valsalva maneuver. During submaximal ergometry speed was increased by 86 [31, 193] rpm compared to constant speed for a median flow increase of 0.2 [0.1, 0.8] L/min. In 3 tests speed could not be increased above constant set speed due to recurring suction and in 3 tests speed could be increased by up to 500 rpm with a pump flowrate increase of up to 0.9 L/min. Conclusion: In this pilot study, safety, short-term efficacy, and physiological responsiveness of a sensorless automated speed control system for a centrifugal LVAD was established. Long term studies are needed to show improved clinical outcomes. Clinical Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier: NCT04786236.

Indexed as

left ventricular assist device (LVAD)mechanical circulatory supportorthostatic transitionsphysiological controlsmart pumpingsubmaximal bicycle ergometryValsalva maneuver

Identifiers

PMID35548436
PMCPMC9081924
OpenAlexW4224313106

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.