Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35548420›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2022

Case Report: Invasive and Non-invasive Hemodynamic Assessment of Coronary Artery Disease: Strengths and Weaknesses.

Ganesh Gajanan, Saurabhi Samant, Chad Hovseth, Yiannis S Chatzizisis

Abstract readCase Reports
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ganesh GajananCardiovascular Division, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, United States.
Saurabhi SamantCardiovascular Division, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, United States.
Chad HovsethCardiovascular Division, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, United States.
Yiannis S ChatzizisisCardiovascular Division, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, United States.

Funding

Patient-Specific Simulations to Guide Coronary Bifurcation StentingR01HL144690 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA MEDICAL CENTER · PI CHATZIZISIS, IOANNIS S · 2019 to 2023
$3.9M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL144690
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Coronary angiography has been the gold standard for assessment of coronary artery disease (CAD) and guidance for percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI). Physiology-guided PCI has shown increased safety and efficacy, improved resource utilization, and better clinical outcomes in patients with stable angina and acute coronary syndromes. The three cases presented and discussed in this report illustrate the strengths and weaknesses of the available invasive and non-invasive methods for the physiological assessment of CAD. As technology evolves, invasive non-wire-based (angiography-derived FFR) and non-invasive (FFR

Indexed as

CCTAcoronary artery diseasecoronary CT angiographycoronary physiologyCT FFRfractional flow reservevFFR

Identifiers

PMID35548420
PMCPMC9083256

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.