Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35548373›Full record

ArticlePediatric health, medicine and therapeutics2022

Characterization of the Difficult Peripheral IV in the Perioperative Setting: A Prospective, Observational Study of Intravenous Access for Pediatric Patients Undergoing Anesthesia.

Grant Heydinger, Shabana Z Shafy, Colin O'Connor, Olubukola Nafiu, Joseph D Tobias, Ralph J Beltran

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pediatric health, medicine and therapeutics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06952829 (Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial Assessing the Effectiveness of a Venipuncture Strategy Adapted According to A-DIVA Score Results Compared to Standard Care in Reducing the Number of Punctures), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06952829 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial Assessing the Effectiveness of a Venipuncture Strategy Adapted According to A-DIVA Score Results Compared to Standard Care in Reducing the Number of Punctures

TypeinterventionalSponsorCentre Hospitalier Intercommunal Robert BallangerRan2025 to 2028Enrolled600ConditionsInternal Medicine, Surgery, NeurologyArmsevaluation of intravenous access of patients with Adult-Difficult IntraVenous Access (A-DIVA) score prior to puncturing subject, evaluation of intravenous access of patients with modified Adult-Difficult IntraVenous access(A-DIVA modified) score prior to puncturing subject
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Peripheral Intravenous Access Rates Obtained by Emergency Medical Services in Pediatric Patients: A Retrospective Study.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Grant HeydingerDepartment of Anesthesiology & Pain Medicine, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2857-5047
Shabana Z ShafyDepartment of Anesthesiology & Pain Medicine, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH, USA.
Colin O'ConnorDepartment of Anesthesiology & Pain Medicine, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH, USA.
Olubukola NafiuDepartment of Anesthesiology & Pain Medicine, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH, USA.
Joseph D TobiasDepartment of Anesthesiology & Pain Medicine, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0550-6951
Ralph J BeltranDepartment of Anesthesiology & Pain Medicine, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0614-3099

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Various criteria exist for defining difficult intravenous access (DIVA) in infants and children. The current study evaluated the factors associated with DIVA in a prospective cohort of over 1000 infants and children presenting for anesthetic care. Methods: This was a prospective, observational study of patients aged 0 to 18 years undergoing elective surgical or radiologic procedures under general anesthesia. Prior to the initial attempt at peripheral intravenous (PIV) cannulation, the anticipated difficulty of PIV catheter placement was determined by the provider using a visual analogue scale (VAS) from 1 to 10. The number of attempts was recorded as well as the time required to achieve PIV access. DIVA was defined as requiring three or more attempts. After successful cannulation, the actual difficulty of the PIV placement was assessed by the provider and recorded using the same VAS. Patient characteristics, including age, race, body mass index (BMI), American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical classification, and history of difficult PIV placement, were evaluated as covariates. Results: In our cohort of 1002 pediatric patients, 78% of patients were successfully cannulated in a single attempt and 91% of patients were successfully cannulated in two or fewer attempts. Factors associated with requiring three or more PIV attempts included younger age (OR 8.73; 95% CI: 3.38, 22.6 for age <1 year and OR 4.93; 95% CI: 2.05, 11.8 for age 1-3 years), higher ASA physical classification (OR 1.95; 95% CI: 1.10, 3.46 for ASA II), and prior history of difficult PIV placement (OR 3.46; 95% CI: 1.70, 7.08). BMI, racial category or gender were not independent predictors of DIVA. Conclusion: We found that approximately 9% of patients required three or more attempts at IV placement in the operating room. Patients that required multiple PIV attempts were more likely to be younger, have a higher ASA classification or a history of difficult PIV placement.

Indexed as

intravenous cannulationpediatric anesthesiologyperipheral intravenous cathetervascular access

Identifiers

PMID35548373
PMCPMC9081190

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.