ArticleFrontiers in plant science2022
Composition and Diversity of Soil Microbial Community Associated With Land Use Types in the Agro-Pastoral Area in the Upper Yellow River Basin.
Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Organic Fertilizer Substitution Regulates Nutrient Availability, Recovery, and Yield in Alpine Rapeseed (Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Comparative Effects of Exogenous Organic Amendments on Rhizosphere Microbial Communities and Soil Properties in Continuous Cropping Watermelon.Microorganisms · 2026Article
- Functional characteristics and distribution of microorganisms in saline and alkaline soils and their probiotic effects: a review.Microbial cell factories · 2026Review
- A novel two-step metabarcoding approach improves soil microbiome biodiversity assessment.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Comparing soil microbial diversity in smallholder plantain backyard gardens and main farms in Western and Central Africa.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- The Unseen Impacts of Human Footprints: How Land Use Reshapes Actinobacterial Communities in the Brazilian Cerrado.Biology · 2025Article
- Responses of Soil Microbial Communities Associated with Phosphorus Transformation to Land-Use Alternations in a Meadow Grassland, Northeast China.Microorganisms · 2025Article
- Characterization of Microbial Carbon Metabolism in Karst Soils from Citrus Orchards and Analysis of Its Environmental Drivers.Microorganisms · 2025Article
- Soil fungal networks exhibit sparser interactions than bacterial networks in diseased banana plantations.Applied and environmental microbiology · 2024Article
- Elevation Determines Fungal Diversity, and Land Use Governs Community Composition: A Dual Perspective from Gaoligong Mountains.Microorganisms · 2024Article
- Response characteristics of soil microorganisms under strong disturbance conditions in the riparian zone of the three Gorges reservoir Area.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Development of a novel sequence based real-time PCR assay for specific and sensitive detection of Burkholderia pseudomallei in clinical and environmental matrices.Annals of clinical microbiology and antimicrobials · 2024Article
- Characterization of Rhizosphere Microbial Diversity and Selection of Plant-Growth-Promoting Bacteria at the Flowering and Fruiting Stages of Rapeseed.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Editorial: Patterns, functions, and processes of alpine grassland ecosystems under global change.Frontiers in plant science · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The microorganisms of soil are sensitive to their living microenvironment, and their community structure and function will change with the environmental conditions. In the agro-pastoral area on the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau, revealing the diversity of the soil microbial communities and its response to different soil physicochemical properties and environmental factors are important for ecosystem management. The microbial (bacteria and archaea) community composition and diversity under different land use types (cultivated land, grazing grassland and planted forest) were analyzed by 16S rRNA (V4 region) method in a typical agro-pastoral region in the upper Yellow River basin. Also, the soil nutrients were studied and correlated with the microbial community. The results showed that the soil nutrient contents in grassland were low, but the available nutrients were relatively high. There was a great spatial variability under different distances to the river. The microbial community diversity was lower in the grassland than the cultivated land and forest land closer to the river. For all land uses, the dominant phyla of soil microorganisms included Proteobacteria, Actinobacteria, and Bacteroidetes, while the abundance of Clostridia was significantly higher than that of the other groups, indicating that Clostridia dominated the Firmicutes and affected soil microbial community composition. The linear discriminant analysis (LDA) effect size (LefSe) analysis showed different biomarkers were more abundant in grassland than other land use types, suggesting that the structure and diversity of soil microorganisms in grassland were significantly different compared with cultivated land and forest land. The distance-based redundancy analysis (db-RDA) results showed that the total phosphorus (TP) and calcium (Ca) were the key environmental factors affecting the diversity and abundance of the soil microbial community in cultivated land and forestland, respectively. However, the microbial diversity in grassland was more related to spatial distance of the river. These results provided a theoretical basis for the changes in the composition, structure, and function of soil microbial communities in agro-pastoral areas.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.