Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35548086›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2022

Multichannel DenseNet Architecture for Classification of Mammographic Breast Density for Breast Cancer Detection.

Shivaji D Pawar, Kamal K Sharma, Suhas G Sapate, Geetanjali Y Yadav, Roobaea Alroobaea, Sabah M Alzahrani, Mustapha Hedabou

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Shivaji D PawarDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Lovely Professional University, Jalandhar, India.
Kamal K SharmaSchool of Electronics and Electrical Engineering, Lovely Professional University, Jalandhar, India.
Suhas G SapateDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Annasaheb Dange College of Engineering and Technology, Sangli, India.
Geetanjali Y YadavNMC Royal Medical Centre Karama, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.
Roobaea AlroobaeaDepartment Computer Science, College of Computers and Information Technology, Taif University, Taif, Saudi Arabia.
Sabah M AlzahraniDepartment Computer Science, College of Computers and Information Technology, Taif University, Taif, Saudi Arabia.
Mustapha HedabouSchool of Computer Science, Mohammed VI Polytechnic University, Ben Guerir, Morocco.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Percentage mammographic breast density (MBD) is one of the most notable biomarkers. It is assessed visually with the support of radiologists with the four qualitative Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BIRADS) categories. It is demanding for radiologists to differentiate between the two variably allocated BIRADS classes, namely, "BIRADS C and BIRADS D." Recently, convolution neural networks have been found superior in classification tasks due to their ability to extract local features with shared weight architecture and space invariance characteristics. The proposed study intends to examine an artificial intelligence (AI)-based MBD classifier toward developing a latent computer-assisted tool for radiologists to distinguish the BIRADS class in modern clinical progress. This article proposes a multichannel DenseNet architecture for MBD classification. The proposed architecture consists of four-channel DenseNet transfer learning architecture to extract significant features from a single patient's two a mediolateral oblique (MLO) and two craniocaudal (CC) views of digital mammograms. The performance of the proposed classifier is evaluated using 200 cases consisting of 800 digital mammograms of the different BIRADS density classes with validated density ground truth. The classifier's performance is assessed with quantitative metrics such as precision, responsiveness, specificity, and the area under the curve (AUC). The concluding preliminary outcomes reveal that this intended multichannel model has delivered good performance with an accuracy of 96.67% during training and 90.06% during testing and an average AUC of 0.9625. Obtained results are also validated qualitatively with the help of a radiologist expert in the field of MBD. Proposed architecture achieved state-of-the-art results with a fewer number of images and with less computation power.

Indexed as

Breast DensityBreast NeoplasmsArtificial IntelligenceFemaleHumansMammographyNeural Networks, ComputerBIRADS Density Classificationbreast cancerdeep learningDenseNetmammographic breast densitymultichannel architecture

Identifiers

PMID35548086
PMCPMC9081505

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.