Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35548028›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical physics

Segmentation of Organs and Tumor within Brain Magnetic Resonance Images Using K-Nearest Neighbor Classification.

S A Yoganathan, Rui Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical physics. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

S A YoganathanDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, USA.
Rui ZhangDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To fully exploit the benefits of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for radiotherapy, it is desirable to develop segmentation methods to delineate patients' MRI images fast and accurately. The purpose of this work is to develop a semi-automatic method to segment organs and tumor within the brain on standard T1- and T2-weighted MRI images. Methods and Materials: Twelve brain cancer patients were retrospectively included in this study, and a simple rigid registration was used to align all the images to the same spatial coordinates. Regions of interest were created for organs and tumor segmentations. The K-nearest neighbor (KNN) classification algorithm was used to characterize the knowledge of previous segmentations using 15 image features (T1 and T2 image intensity, 4 Gabor filtered images, 6 image gradients, and 3 Cartesian coordinates), and the trained models were used to predict organ and tumor contours. Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), normalized surface dice, sensitivity, specificity, and Hausdorff distance were used to evaluate the performance of segmentations. Results: Our semi-automatic segmentations matched with the ground truths closely. The mean DSC value was between 0.49 (optical chiasm) and 0.89 (right eye) for organ segmentations and was 0.87 for tumor segmentation. Overall performance of our method is comparable or superior to the previous work, and the accuracy of our semi-automatic segmentation is generally better for large volume objects. Conclusion: The proposed KNN method can accurately segment organs and tumor using standard brain MRI images, provides fast and accurate image processing and planning tools, and paves the way for clinical implementation of MRI-guided radiotherapy and adaptive radiotherapy.

Indexed as

Brain cancerK-nearest neighbormachine learningmagnetic resonance imagingradiotherapysegmentation

Identifiers

PMID35548028
PMCPMC9084578

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.