Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35547784›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease2022

FIDEPOC: Consensus on Inspiratory Flow and Lung Deposition as Key Decision Factors in COPD Inhaled Therapy.

Fernando González-Torralba, Adolfo Baloira, Araceli Abad, Antonia Fuster, Juan Luis García-Rivero, Patricia García-Sidro, Eduardo Márquez-Martín, Marta Palop, Néstor Soler, José Luis Velasco

Open access · goldAbstract readConsensus Statement
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 10 institutions in 1 country.

Fernando González-TorralbaRespiratory Department, University Hospital of Aranjuez, Madrid, Spain.
Adolfo BaloiraRespiratory Department, University Hospital of Pontevedra, Pontevedra, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-3944-084X
Araceli AbadRespiratory Department, University Hospital of Getafe, Madrid, Spain.
Antonia FusterRespiratory Department, University Hospital Son Llatzer, Palma de Mallorca, Spain.
Juan Luis García-RiveroRespiratory Department, University Hospital Marqués de Valdecilla, Santander, Spain.
Patricia García-SidroRespiratory Department, University Hospital of La Plana, Castellón, Spain.
Eduardo Márquez-MartínRespiratory Department, University Hospital Virgen del Rocío, Sevilla, Spain.
Marta PalopRespiratory Department, Hospital of Sagunto, Valencia, Spain.
Néstor SolerRespiratory Department, Hospital Clinic, Barcelona, Spain.
José Luis VelascoRespiratory Department, University Hospital Virgen de la Victoria, Málaga, Spain.
Ayuntamiento de Castellón de la Plana · ESComplejo Hospitalario de Pontevedra · ESHospital Clínic de Barcelona · ESHospital Clínico Universitario Virgen de la Victoria · ESHospital de Sagunto · ESHospital Son Llatzer · ESHospital Universitario de Getafe · ESHospital Universitario del Tajo · ESHospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío · ESMarqués de Valdecilla University Hospital · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: The pharmacological treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is largely based on inhaled bronchodilators. Inspiratory flow and lung deposition are key parameters to be considered in inhaled therapy; however, the relationship between these two parameters, the patient specificities, and the suitability of the inhaler type for COPD management has not been fully addressed. The present study follows a Delphi Panel methodology to find expert consensus on the role of inspiratory flow and lung deposition as key decision factors in COPD inhaled therapy. Methods: A two-round Delphi Panel, consisting of 38 statements (items) and completed by 57 Spanish pulmonologists, was carried out to measure the experts' consensus degree with each item. Results: A high degree of consensus was reached on most of the items consulted, among these inspiratory flow or inspiratory capacity should be periodically considered when choosing an inhalation device and to ensure the suitability of the inhaler used; the outflow velocity and particle size of the different devices should be considered to ensure adequate lung deposition; an active device (pressurized metered-dose inhalers (pMDI) or soft mist inhalers (SMI)) should be used in patients with low inspiratory flow to achieve adequate lung deposition; and, the use of dry powder inhalers (DPI) should be re-evaluated in patients with severe obstruction and severe exacerbations. Conclusion: This study shows the relevance of inspiratory flow and the degree of particle deposition in the lung in the choice of an inhalation device for COPD management, as well as the convenience of an SMI type device in cases of low inspiratory flow. Moreover, it highlights the scarcity of information on the specific features of inhalation devices in COPD guidelines.

Indexed as

Pulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveAdministration, InhalationBronchodilator AgentsConsensusDry Powder InhalersEquipment DesignHumansLungMetered Dose InhalersNebulizers and VaporizersBronchodilator Agentsdry powder inhalersexacerbationsinhaled therapy devicepressurized metered-dose inhalerssoft mist inhaler

Identifiers

PMID35547784
PMCPMC9081625
OpenAlexW4225421653

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.