Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35547656›Full record

ReviewEvidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM2022

The Research and Development Thinking on the Status of Artificial Intelligence in Traditional Chinese Medicine.

Nan Li, Jiarui Yu, Xiaobo Mao, Yuping Zhao, Luqi Huang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Nan LiSchool of Electrical Engineering, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450001, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7619-1139
Jiarui YuSchool of Electrical Engineering, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450001, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9158-6478
Xiaobo MaoSchool of Electrical Engineering, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450001, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4330-5731
Yuping ZhaoChina Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijng 100020, China.
Luqi HuangChina Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijng 100020, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With the rapid development and application of artificial intelligence (AI) in medical field, the diagnostic ways of human health and the social medical structures have changed. Based on the concept of holism and the theory of syndrome differentiation and treatment, TCM realizes comprehensive informatization and intelligence with the help of AI technology in data mining, intelligent diagnosis and treatment, intelligent learning, and decision-making. Furthermore, the intelligent research of TCM technology will further promote the improvement in TCM diagnosis and treatment rules and the leaping development of TCM intelligent instruments. In this article, we performed a systematic review of scientific literature about TCM and AI. Moreover, the practical problems of TCM intellectualization, the current situation and demand of TCM, and the influence of AI in the TCM field are discussed by searching for literature using TCM scientific databases, reference lists, expert consultation, and targeted websites. Finally, we look forward to the application prospects of AI and propose a possible future direction of intelligent TCM in the current health-care system in China.

Identifiers

PMID35547656
PMCPMC9085309

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.