ArticleOrthopaedic journal of sports medicine2022
Determining the Substantial Clinical Benefit Values for Patient-Reported Outcome Scores After Primary ACL Reconstruction.
Article in Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.
- Jumping Dot Sign: A New Radiological Sign Predicting Inferior Clinical Outcome and Higher Cyst Recurrence Following Bone Marrow Stimulation for Cystic Osteochondral Lesions of the Talus.Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine · 2025Article
- Establishing Threshold Values for the Patient Acceptable Symptom State After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction for the Self Knee Value and the Anterior Cruciate Ligament-Return to Sport after Injury Scale.Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine · 2025Article
- Article
- Can KOOS-PS be replaced with a simple anchor question in patients after total knee arthroplasty?: an agreement study of 2,478 primary surgeries.Acta orthopaedica · 2024Article
- Article
- Superior Biological Healing of Hamstring Autografts Compared with Tibialis Allografts after Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis Based on Second-Look Arthroscopy.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2024Article
- Correlation between Anterior Cruciate Ligament-Return to Sport after Injury Score at 6 Months after Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction and Mid-Term Functional Test Results: An Observational Study at 5-Year Follow-Up.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Defining the minimal clinically important difference for IKDC and KOOS scores for patients undergoing tibial tubercle osteotomy for patellofemoral pain or instability.Journal of experimental orthopaedics · 2024Article
- Addition of anterolateral ligament reconstruction to primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction could benefit recovery of functional outcomes.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Comparison of the PROMIS and iHOT-12 in Determining Satisfaction Levels After Hip Arthroscopy for FAIS.Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Little is known about the threshold of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) at which patients perceive to have attained a substantial clinical benefit (SCB) after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). Purpose: To determine the SCB value of PROs 1 year after ACLR in the general population and to determine factors that predict SCB attainment. Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: The Lysholm, International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Evaluation Form (IKDC-SKF), Tegner, and Anterior Cruciate Ligament-Return to Sport after Injury (ACL-RSI) scores were examined postoperatively in 88 patients who underwent ACLR. At the 12-month follow-up visit, the patients answered 2 independent anchor questions about daily discomfort and functional recovery. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to differentiate PRO scores between patients who responded as having no difficulty versus some difficulty with daily knee discomfort (anchor question 1) and between patients with substantial recovery versus nonsubstantial recovery of knee function (anchor question 2). The area under the ROC curve (AUC) was calculated to assess reliability, and the differences between the AUC values were compared. Multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to determine predictors affecting SCB attainment. Results: There were 76 patients enrolled in this study. The 12-month Lysholm, IKDC-SKF, Tegner, and ACL-RSI scores that corresponded to the SCB were 88.0, 85.1, 6.5, and 64.2 for anchor question 1 and 84.5, 77.7, 5.5, and 57.1 for anchor question 2, respectively. The AUC values obtained from the ROC curve analyses showed acceptable to excellent reliability (anchor question 1: Lysholm, 0.90; IKDC-SKF, 0.86; Tegner, 0.71; ACL-RSI, 0.92; anchor question 2: Lysholm, 0.80; IKDC-SKF, 0.90; Tegner, 0.82; ACL-RSI, 0.82) and were all statistically significant ( Conclusion: The postoperative Lysholm, IKDC-SKF, Tegner, and ACL-RSI scores showed acceptable to excellent reliability in predicting the SCB after ACLR in the general population. Age at surgery and thigh muscle strength influenced SCB attainment for all PROs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.