Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35547593›Full record

ArticlePaediatric & neonatal pain2021

Nurses' perception, knowledge, and use of neonatal pain assessment.

Martina Carlsen Misic, Randi Dovland Andersen, Sofia Strand, Mats Eriksson, Emma Olsson

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Paediatric & neonatal pain, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
5.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Validation and reliability of a scale for prolonged pain assessment in Brazilian neonates.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Martina Carlsen MisicDepartment of Pediatrics Faculty of Medicine and Health School of Health Sciences Örebro University Örebro Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8752-0943
Randi Dovland AndersenFaculty of Medicine and Health School of Health Sciences Örebro University Örebro Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6857-7058
Sofia StrandFaculty of Medicine and Health School of Health Sciences Örebro University Örebro Sweden.
Mats ErikssonFaculty of Medicine and Health School of Health Sciences Örebro University Örebro Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5996-2584
Emma OlssonDepartment of Pediatrics Faculty of Medicine and Health School of Health Sciences Örebro University Örebro Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-5582-6147
Örebro University · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Preterm and sick newborn infants undergo several painful procedures during their hospital stay, potentially leading to short- and long-term negative consequences. Pain assessment should be performed regularly to provide optimal pain management. Nurses' knowledge of and attitude toward neonatal pain assessment affect how pain is assessed and managed in the clinical situation. The aim of this study was to explore Swedish nurses' perception, knowledge, and use of neonatal pain assessment. This descriptive, cross-sectional questionnaire study was conducted across all Swedish neonatal units (n = 38). Respondents were chosen through convenience sampling by the head nurses at each unit. Ten nurses from each unit were asked to complete the survey, which contained both closed and open questions. A majority of the units (30/38; 79%) participated and 232 surveys were returned, a response rate of 61%. Of the nurses, 91% thought that neonatal pain assessment was important. Many nurses mentioned various difficulties with pain assessment and concerns that the scales used might not assess pain correctly. About half of the nurses considered themselves to have enough knowledge of neonatal pain assessment. Those who reported having enough knowledge of pain assessment viewed the pain scales used at their units more positively. Of the nurses, 74% reported using a pain assessment scale several times per work shift. Pain management guidelines were available according to 75% of nurses, but only 53% reported that the guidelines were followed. Although nurses in general expressed a positive attitude toward pain assessment scales, this was not necessarily evident in their clinical practice. Lack of knowledge, available or accessible guidelines, or concerns regarding the validity of available pain scales seemed to limit their use.

Indexed as

neonatal pain assessmentneonatal pain managementnewborn infantnursing

Identifiers

PMID35547593
PMCPMC8975217
OpenAlexW3161517320

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.