Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35547463›Full record

ReviewCureus2022

Factors Impacting Stent Thrombosis in Patients With Percutaneous Coronary Intervention and Coronary Stenting: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Nso Nso, Mahmoud Nassar, Milana Zirkiyeva, Yolanda Mbome, Anthony Lyonga Ngonge, Solomon O Badejoko, Shahzad Akbar, Atika Azhar, Sofia Lakhdar, Laura M Guzman Perez and 3 more

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. A nightmare of clopidogrel resistance in a resource-limited setting: case report of subacute stent thrombosis.The Egyptian heart journal : (EHJ) : official bulletin of the Egyptian Society of Cardiology · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Nso NsoInternal Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai/NYC Health+Hospitals Queens, New York City, USA.
Mahmoud NassarInternal Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai/NYC Health+Hospitals Queens, New York City, USA.
Milana ZirkiyevaInternal Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai/NYC Health+Hospitals Queens, New York City, USA.
Yolanda MbomeInternal Medicine, Richmond University Medical Center, New York City, USA.
Anthony Lyonga NgongeMedicine, Howard University Hospital, Washington, D.C., USA.
Solomon O BadejokoInternal Medicine, St. Joseph's Medical Center, Stockton, USA.
Shahzad AkbarInternal Medicine, Kettering Health, Dayton, USA.
Atika AzharInternal Medicine, Upstate University Hospital, Syracuse, USA.
Sofia LakhdarMedicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai/NYC Health+Hospitals Queens, New York City, USA.
Laura M Guzman PerezInternal Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, Queens Hospital Center, New York City, USA.
Yousef AbdalazeemEmergency Medicine, East and North Hertfordshire NHS Trust/North Hertfordshire College (NHC), Stevenage, GBR.
Vincent RizzoInternal Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai/NYC Health+Hospitals Queens, New York City, USA.
Most MuniraCardiology/Medicine, Weil Cornell Medicine, New York City, USA.
Howard University Hospital · USMount Sinai Queens · USSt. Joseph Medical Center · USUpstate University Hospital · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Stent thrombosis (ST) is a frequently reported complication in cardiac patients with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) that adversely impacts their prognostic outcomes. Medical literature reveals several baseline characteristics of PCI patients that may predict their predisposition to ST and its potential complications. Our systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to determine the diagnostic significance of these baseline parameters in terms of determining the risk of ST among adult patients with PCI.  We statistically evaluated 18 baseline characteristics of more than 15,500 PCI patients to delineate their stent thrombosis attribution. We included a number of articles focusing on baseline parameters in-stent thrombosis-related PCI scenarios. We explored the articles of interest based on inclusion/exclusion parameters across PubMed, JSTOR, Cochrane library, Google Scholar, and Embase. Medical subject headings (MeSH) words included "stent thrombosis," "percutaneous coronary intervention," and "coronary stenting." We extracted the research articles published between 2005 and 2021 on April 20, 2021. The included studies also focused on procedures and clinical factors concerning their association with PCI-related ST. Our findings ruled out the progression of abnormal left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF)-related stent thrombosis in PCI patients (odds ratio {OR}: 9.68, 95% CI: 1.88-49.90, p=0.007). We found an insignificant clinical correlation between stent thrombosis and PCI in the setting of acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Our study outcomes further revealed the absence of stent thrombosis in PCI patients with antiplatelet prescription (OR: 32.42, 95% CI: 21.28-49.39). The findings affirmed the absence of ST in PCI patients receiving aspirin therapy (OR: 32.77, 95% CI: 18.73-57.34; OR: 4.59, 95% CI: 1.97-10.73). The majority of the included studies negated the clinical correlation of stent thrombosis with diabetes mellitus in the setting of PCI (OR: 0.49, 95% CI: 0.06-3.78). Our study did not reveal statistically significant results based on stent thrombosis in PCI patients with drug-eluting stents (OR: 2.91, 95% CI: 0.35-24.49). The findings also did not reveal the impact of cardiac biomarker elevation on stent thrombosis in PCI patients (OR: 8.42, 95% CI: 2.54-27.98, p=0.0005). Eight studies revealed a statistically insignificant correlation between myocardial infarction and stent thrombosis in PCI scenarios (OR: 2.69, 95% CI: 0.89-8.11, p=0.08). The clinical correlation between PCI and stent thrombosis/major bleeding in the setting of hypertension also proved statistically insignificant at 0.67 (OR: 1.31, 95% CI: 0.38-4.51, p=0.97). The study findings did not correlate mean body mass index and multivessel coronary artery disease with ST in PCI scenarios (OR: 1.98, 95% CI: 0.02-239.58, p=0.78; OR: 1.09, 95% CI: 0.58-2.04, p=0.80). Only two studies revealed statistically significant results confirming stent thrombosis in PCI patients with a prior history of PCI (OR: 0.49, 95% CI: 0.23-1.06; OR: 0.33, 95% CI: 0.02-5.59; p=0.03). Our findings question the clinical significance of baseline characteristics in terms of predicting stent thrombosis in PCI patients. The results support the requirement of future studies to investigate complex interactions between procedural, medicinal, genetic, and patient-related factors contributing to the development of stent thrombosis in PCI patients.

Indexed as

acute coronary syndromebare-metal stentscoronary stentingdrug-eluting stentsnon-st segment elevation myocardial infarction (nstemi)percutaneous coronary interventionst-elevation myocardial infarction (stemi)stent thrombosis

Identifiers

PMID35547463
PMCPMC9089933
OpenAlexW4225727787

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.