Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35547356›Full record

ReviewBioMed research international2022

Understanding the Cellular Sources of the Fractional Exhaled Nitric Oxide (FeNO) and Its Role as a Biomarker of Type 2 Inflammation in Asthma.

Jose M Escamilla-Gil, Mar Fernandez-Nieto, Nathalie Acevedo

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BioMed research international, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 54 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
54citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
9.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

54 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 82 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Predictors of asthma exacerbations in children with or without house dust mite allergy.International journal of occupational medicine and environmental health · 2026
    Observational
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Type 2 inflammation accelerates CD4Journal of Zhejiang University. Science. B · 2026
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Jose M Escamilla-GilInstitute for Immunological Research, University of Cartagena, Cartagena 130014, Colombia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7821-8702
Mar Fernandez-NietoServicio de Alergología Fundación Jiménez Díaz IIS CIBERES (Ciber de Enfermedades Respiratorias) Unidad Multidisciplinar de Asma, Madrid 28040, Spain.
Nathalie AcevedoInstitute for Immunological Research, University of Cartagena, Cartagena 130014, Colombia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5154-2964
University of Cartagena · COCentro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Respiratorias · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) has gained great clinical importance as a biomarker of type 2 inflammation in chronic airway diseases such as asthma. FeNO originates primarily in the bronchial epithelium and is produced in large quantities by the enzyme inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS). It should be noted that nitric oxide (NO) produced at femtomolar to picomolar levels is fundamental for respiratory physiology. This basal production is induced in the bronchial epithelium by interferon gamma (IFN

Indexed as

AsthmaExhalationBiomarkersBreath TestsFractional Exhaled Nitric Oxide TestingHumansInflammationNitric OxideBiomarkersNitric Oxide

Identifiers

PMID35547356
PMCPMC9085317
OpenAlexW4225274965

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.