ArticleFrontiers in medicine2022
Different Surgical Approaches for Early-Stage Ovarian Cancer Staging. A Large Monocentric Experience.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Where are we going with sentinel nodes mapping in ovarian cancer?Frontiers in oncology · 2022Pooled it
- The Impact of Minimally Invasive Surgery in the Treatment of Ovarian Cancer in Young Patients.Cancers · 2025Article
- Exploring Vascular Complications in Ovarian Cancer Surgery: A Narrative Literature Review with a New Management Proposal Algorithm.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Minimally Invasive Surgery for the Management of Ovarian Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.O&G open · 2024Review
- Efficacy and safety of minimally invasive laparoscopic surgery under general anesthesia for ovarian cancer.World journal of clinical cases · 2024Article
- A comprehensive review on the potential of coumarin and related derivatives as multi-target therapeutic agents in the management of gynecological cancers.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2024Review
- Speculation on optimal numbers of examined lymph node for early-stage epithelial ovarian cancer from the perspective of stage migration.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Article
- Prognostic nomogram that predicts progression-free survival and overall survival of patients with ovarian clear cell carcinoma.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Article
- The value of ultrasonography combined with carbohydrate antigen 125 and 19-9 detection in the diagnosis of borderline ovarian tumors and prediction of recurrence.Frontiers in surgery · 2022Article
- Editorial: Challenges, techniques and pitfalls in surgery: How far can we push the boundaries?Frontiers in oncology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Ovarian cancer is the third most frequent gynecological cancer. In early stage ovarian cancer (ESOC) comprehensive surgical staging is recommended. Surgical staging is traditionally approached by laparotomy, although minimally invasive surgery can be a valid alternative in selected patients. This study aims to analyze the surgical and oncological outcomes of three different surgical approaches in a large series of patients. Methods: We retrospectively included all histologically proven ESOC cases treated between January 2014 and December 2017. ESOC was defined as stage IA to IIB according to the 2018 FIGO staging system. Subjects were divided into groups 1, 2, and 3, based on the surgical approach (open abdominal, laparoscopic, or robotic, respectively). Results: Within patients enrolled during the study period, 455 met the inclusion criteria. No difference in intraoperative complications was recorded in the three groups ( Conclusion: No significant difference was found in OS and DFS among the three groups (open, laparoscopic, and robotic). The minimally invasive approach showed lower rate of complications than the laparotomic approach.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.