Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35547197›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in human neuroscience2022

Rectangularity Is Stronger Than Symmetry in Interpreting 2D Pictures as 3D Objects.

Kokichi Sugihara, Baingio Pinna

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in human neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Kokichi SugiharaMeiji Institute for Advanced Study of Mathematical Sciences, Meiji University, Tokyo, Japan.
Baingio PinnaDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, University of Sassari, Sardinia, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It is known that the human brain has a strong preference for rectangularity in interpreting pictures as 3D shapes. Symmetry is also considered to be a factor that the human vision system places high priority on when perceiving 3D objects. Thus, a question is raised: which is more basic, the rectangularity preference or the symmetry preference? To answer this question, we carried out experiments using pictures that have at least two interpretations as 3D objects, one of which was rectangular but not symmetric, and the other of which was symmetric but not rectangular. We found that the preference for rectangularity is stronger than that for symmetry. This observation will help us to understand various 3D optical illusions, including the room-size illusion and the ambiguous object illusion.

Indexed as

depth illusiondepth perceptionimage interpretationrectangularityroom-size illusionshape constancysymmetry

Identifiers

PMID35547197
PMCPMC9082066

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.