Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35547100›Full record

ArticleClinicoEconomics and outcomes research : CEOR2022

Assessment of Primary Health Care Specialized Reference Clinics in Riyadh First Health Cluster: Outcome, Cost-Effectiveness and Patient Satisfaction.

Abdulmajeed Alshowair, Saleh Altamimi, Faisal Alruhaimi, Ali Tolba, Alhanouf Almeshari, Rehab Almubrick, Amro Abdel-Azeem

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ClinicoEconomics and outcomes research : CEOR, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Successes, weaknesses, and recommendations to strengthen primary health care: a scoping review.Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Abdulmajeed AlshowairCommunity Health Excellence, Riyadh First Health Cluster Ministry of Health, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Saleh AltamimiCommunity Health Excellence, Riyadh First Health Cluster Ministry of Health, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Faisal AlruhaimiCommunity Health Excellence, Riyadh First Health Cluster Ministry of Health, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Ali TolbaCommunity Health Excellence, Riyadh First Health Cluster Ministry of Health, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Alhanouf AlmeshariPublic Health Administration, Riyadh First Health Cluster Ministry of Health, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Rehab AlmubrickPopulation Health Management, Riyadh First Health Cluster Ministry of Health, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0003-4205-3453
Amro Abdel-AzeemPopulation Health Management, Riyadh First Health Cluster Ministry of Health, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0001-8607-1536

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: The objectives of the study are to assess the outcome and cost-effectiveness of specialized reference clinics (SRCs) in primary health care centers (PHCCs) of Riyadh First Health Cluster (RFHC), then to estimate the patient satisfaction among clients utilizing such SRCs. Patients and Methods: This facility-based study was conducted in Riyadh city, Saudi Arabia among six PHCCs in RFHC that contain SRCs. Records of all patients utilizing SRCs and their referral information were studied along two years. An in-depth interview was conducted with health care providers in SRCs. Cost analysis was calculated by the financial support group within RFHC. Also, a randomly selected 400 subjects utilizing SRCs were asked to fill patient satisfaction questionnaire. Results: Over two years, a total number of 55,084 patients utilized SRCs among different specialties. Most of these patients (86.7%) had full medical service within PHC-SRCs with no need for referral to hospitals. SRCs are significantly effective in decreasing the burden on hospitals in most specialties (p < 0.001). This effectiveness is significantly increased during the 2nd year of service. The time spent until appointment is significantly reduced from an average of six weeks in hospitals to an average of one week in SRCs. SRCs are very cost-effective as they reduced referrals to hospitals by 86.7% among 55,084 patients who utilized SRCs over two years, saving total costs of about 14.08 million Saudi Riyals (3.75 million US dollars). Most of the specialties are cost-effective except for urology and general surgery clinics, which are not cost-effective. Patient satisfaction is high regarding all service domains. The overall patient satisfaction score increased from 71.4% in the 1st year up to 73.2% in the second year. Conclusion: PHC-SRCs are cost-effective health services and their creation is reasonable and beneficial in terms of reducing costs of health care delivery, reducing the burden on hospitals, and improving patient satisfaction.

Indexed as

cost-effectivenessoutcomepatient satisfactionprimary health carespecialized reference clinics

Identifiers

PMID35547100
PMCPMC9084193

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.