Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35546918›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2022

What Is the Minimum Clinically Important Change in Negative Symptoms of Schizophrenia? PANSS Based

Pál Czobor, Barbara Sebe, Károly Acsai, Ágota Barabássy, István Laszlovszky, György Németh, Toshi A Furukawa, Stefan Leucht

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. The minimal important difference in obsessive-compulsive disorder: An analysis of double-blind SSRI trials in adults.European psychiatry : the journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Pál CzoborDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
Barbara SebeGlobal Medical Division, Gedeon Richter Plc, Budapest, Hungary.
Károly AcsaiGlobal Medical Division, Gedeon Richter Plc, Budapest, Hungary.
Ágota BarabássyGlobal Medical Division, Gedeon Richter Plc, Budapest, Hungary.
István LaszlovszkyGlobal Medical Division, Gedeon Richter Plc, Budapest, Hungary.
György NémethGlobal Medical Division, Gedeon Richter Plc, Budapest, Hungary.
Toshi A FurukawaDepartment of Health Promotion and Human Behavior, Kyoto University School of Public Health, Kyoto, Japan.
Stefan LeuchtDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Gedeon Richter (Hungary) · HUKyoto University · JPSemmelweis University · HUTechnical University of Munich · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Minimum clinically important difference (MCID) is a measure that defines the minimum amount of change in an objective score of a clinical test that must be reached for that change to be clinically noticeable. We aimed to find the MCID for patients with predominantly negative symptoms of schizophrenia at its earliest occurrence. Methods: Data of a 26-week long, double-blind study with 454 patients [Positive and Negative Symptom Scale Negative Factor Score (PANSS-FSNS) ≥24, Positive and Negative Symptom Scale Positive Factor Score (PANSS-FSPS) ≤ 19] treated with cariprazine 4.5 mg/d or risperidone 4 mg/d were analyzed. The Clinical Global Impression-Improvement scale was used to quantify minimum improvement (CGI-I = 3) and no clinical change (CGI-I = 4) on the PANSS-FSNS, and the MCID was estimated with the following methods: as the mean PANSS-FSNS changes corresponding to the first instance of minimal improvement across all visits (MCID Results: The MCID Conclusion: Applying different methods led to different results, ranging between 7.3 and 18.5% improvement from the baseline for the MCID at its earliest occurrence in patients with predominantly negative symptoms of schizophrenia.

Indexed as

cariprazineclinical trialMCIDminimum clinically important differencenegative symptomsschizophrenia

Identifiers

PMID35546918
PMCPMC9083222
OpenAlexW4224313524

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.