ReviewJournal of pain research2022
Best Practices for Minimally Invasive Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Treatment 2.0 (MIST): Consensus Guidance from the American Society of Pain and Neuroscience (ASPN).
Review in Journal of pain research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
25 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.
- The MOTION randomized controlled trial for treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis using the percutaneous mild® procedure: 5-year results.Interventional pain medicine · 2026Article
- Review
- Standalone interspinous process devices for lumbar spinal stenosis: a critical literature review.BMC surgery · 2026Review
- When Regional Anesthesia is Mistaken for Pain Medicine: The Importance of Etiology-Driven Interventional Pain Management.Journal of pain research · 2026Article
- Early Clinical and Radiologic Evaluation of Endoscopic Unilateral Laminectomy for Bilateral Decompression in Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Retrospective Study.International journal of spine surgery · 2025Article
- Article
- Preprocedural Imaging Review Before Performing Epidural Steroid Injections: Analysis of Physician Practice Parameters.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Three-year results of the MOTION randomized controlled trial for treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis using the percutaneousInterventional pain medicine · 2025Article
- The American Society of Pain and Neuroscience (ASPN) Guidelines and Consensus on the Definition, Current Evidence, Clinical Use and Future Applications for Physiologic Closed-Loop Controlled Neuromodulation in Chronic Pain: A NEURON Group Project.Journal of pain research · 2025Review
- Consensus Guidelines from the American Society of Pain and Neuroscience for the Use of 60-Day Peripheral Nerve Stimulation Therapy. A NEURON Living Guideline Project.Journal of pain research · 2025Article
- An Evidence-Based Consensus for the Use of Neurostimulation for the Treatment of Non-Surgical Low Back Pain: The NEURON Group.Journal of pain research · 2025Review
- Safety and Efficacy of Interspinous Fixation Device via Lateral Transverse Approach in Patients with Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Single Center, Retrospective, Observational Study.Journal of pain research · 2025Article
- A Retrospective Comparative Analysis of Transforaminal Epidural Steroid Injections and Percutaneous Transforaminal Endoscopic Discectomy for Managing Lumbar Radiculopathy in Super Elderly Patients.Clinical interventions in aging · 2025Article
- Factfinders for patient safety: Epidural steroid injection in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis.Interventional pain medicine · 2024Article
- Cellular and Molecular Mechanisms of Hypertrophy of Ligamentum Flavum.Biomolecules · 2024Review
- Seeing the unseen: The role of bioimaging techniques for the diagnostic interventions in intervertebral disc degeneration.Bone reports · 2024Review
- Percutaneous image-guided lumbar decompression and outpatient laminectomy for the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis: a 2-year Medicare claims benchmark study.Interventional pain medicine · 2024Article
- Pacific Spine and Pain Society (PSPS) Evidence Review of Surgical Treatments for Lumbar Degenerative Spinal Disease: A Narrative Review.Pain and therapy · 2024Review
- Novel approach of ultrasound-guided lateral recess block for a patient with lateral recess stenosis: A case report.World journal of clinical cases · 2024Article
- American Society of Pain and Neuroscience Best Practice (ASPN) Guideline for the Treatment of Sacroiliac Disorders [Response to Letter].Journal of pain research · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors at 15 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) is a common spinal disease of aging with a growing patient population, paralleling population growth. Minimally invasive treatments are evolving, and the use of these techniques needs guidance to provide the optimal patient safety and efficacy outcomes. Methods: The American Society of Pain and Neuroscience (ASPN) identified an educational need for guidance on the prudent use of the innovative minimally invasive surgical therapies for the treatment of symptomatic LSS. The executive board nominated experts spanning anesthesiology, physiatry, orthopedic surgery, and neurosurgery based on expertise, publications, research, diversity and field of practice. Evidence was reviewed, graded using the United States Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) criteria for evidence and recommendation strength and grade, and expert opinion was added to make consensus points for best practice. Results: The world literature in English was searched using Medline, EMBASE, Cochrane CENTRAL, BioMed Central, Web of Science, Google Scholar, PubMed, Current Contents Connect, Scopus, and meeting abstracts to identify and compile the evidence (per section) for LSS-related pain. Search words were selected based upon the section represented. Identified peer-reviewed literature was critiqued using USPSTF criteria and consensus points are presented. Discussion: The algorithm for patient selection in the management of symptomatic spinal stenosis is evolving. Careful consideration of patient selection and anatomic architecture variance is critical for improved outcomes and patient safety. Conclusion: ASPN created a guidance for best practice for minimally invasive surgical treatment of symptomatic spinal stenosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.