Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35546886›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2022

A Comparison of Single- and Multi-Echo Processing of Functional MRI Data During Overt Autobiographical Recall.

Adrian W Gilmore, Anna M Agron, Estefanía I González-Araya, Stephen J Gotts, Alex Martin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Robust-tedana: An automated denoising pipeline for multi-echo fMRI data.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Processing, evaluating, and understanding FMRI data with afni_proc.py.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2024
    Article
  9. Breakthroughs and challenges for generating brain network-based biomarkers of treatment response in depression.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2024
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Adrian W GilmoreLaboratory of Brain and Cognition, National Institute of Mental Health, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, United States.
Anna M AgronLaboratory of Brain and Cognition, National Institute of Mental Health, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, United States.
Estefanía I González-ArayaLaboratory of Brain and Cognition, National Institute of Mental Health, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, United States.
Stephen J GottsLaboratory of Brain and Cognition, National Institute of Mental Health, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, United States.
Alex MartinLaboratory of Brain and Cognition, National Institute of Mental Health, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, United States.

Funding

The Neural Foundations for Memory and Social Cognition In The Human BrainZIAMH002588 · NIMH · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF MENTAL HEALTH · PI MARTIN, ALEX · 2009 to 2025
$21.1M
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent years have seen an increase in the use of multi-echo fMRI designs by cognitive neuroscientists. Acquiring multiple echoes allows one to increase contrast-to-noise; reduce signal dropout and thermal noise; and identify nuisance signal components in BOLD data. At the same time, multi-echo acquisitions increase data processing complexity and may incur a cost to the temporal and spatial resolution of the acquired data. Here, we re-examine a multi-echo dataset previously analyzed using multi-echo independent components analysis (ME-ICA) and focused on hippocampal activity during the overtly spoken recall of recent and remote autobiographical memories. The goal of the present series of analyses was to determine if ME-ICA's theoretical denoising benefits might lead to a practical difference in the overall conclusions reached. Compared to single-echo (SE) data, ME-ICA led to qualitatively different findings regarding hippocampal contributions to autobiographical recall: whereas the SE analysis largely failed to reveal hippocampal activity relative to an active baseline, ME-ICA results supported predictions of the Standard Model of Consolidation and a time limited hippocampal involvement. These data provide a practical example of the benefits multi-echo denoising in a naturalistic memory paradigm and demonstrate how they can be used to address long-standing theoretical questions.

Indexed as

autobiographical memoryfMRIhippocampusmulti-echo fMRItime

Identifiers

PMID35546886
PMCPMC9081814

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.