Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35546843›Full record

ArticleRSC advances2018

A simple capillary viscometer based on the ideal gas law.

Le Hoang Phu Pham, Luis Bautista, Deyvid C Vargas, Xiaolong Luo

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in RSC advances, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 47% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Le Hoang Phu PhamDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, The Catholic University of America Washington D.C. 20064 USA luox@cua.edu +1 202 319 5173 +1 202 319 6952.
Luis BautistaDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, The Catholic University of America Washington D.C. 20064 USA luox@cua.edu +1 202 319 5173 +1 202 319 6952.
Deyvid C VargasDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, The Catholic University of America Washington D.C. 20064 USA luox@cua.edu +1 202 319 5173 +1 202 319 6952.
Xiaolong LuoDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, The Catholic University of America Washington D.C. 20064 USA luox@cua.edu +1 202 319 5173 +1 202 319 6952.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9939-2766
University of America · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We report a simple, inexpensive and user-friendly capillary viscometer based on the measurement of pressure drop in capillary tubing using the principle of ideal gas law. Viscosity is an important physical property of a fluid that provides molecular information of the fluid's behavior under flow conditions. Measuring viscosity, however, generally requires relatively large fluid volume samples and is expensive with commercial viscometers. Microfluidic viscometers at different levels of complexity can measure fluids at different flow rates with a small sample volume but the cost of commercially available microfluidic viscometers is still high. The reported capillary viscometer is cost-effective, uses small amounts of sample fluid and can measure viscosity under various shear rates. According to the Hagen-Poiseuille equation, the pressure drop of laminar flows in a capillary at a given flow rate is proportional to the viscosity of the fluid. When an enclosed air volume is connected to the upstream of the capillary, the pressure drop can be calculated with the change of the connected air volume, which is reflected by the displacement change of the air-liquid interface in the connecting capillary to the enclosed air volume. Based on these principles, the viscometer was assembled with readily accessible materials, and required no internal sensors or extensive programming. Measurements were successfully performed for five liquids including water, acetone, 2% fat milk, glycerin 30% and glycerin 40%. Except for acetone, the difference between measured and known viscosity was within 4% and highly consistent, well within the 13% uncertainty errors of readily accessible laboratory materials. Overall, the simple viscometer was easily assembled with low cost materials, was portable and accurate, and provided an alternative to expensive commercial viscometers. Finally, the simple capillary viscometer was a good outreach project for K-12 students to understand fluid behavior.

Identifiers

PMID35546843
PMCPMC9085397
OpenAlexW2889284591

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.