Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35546798›Full record

ArticleIUCrJ2022

The benefits of Cu

Florian Meurer, Carolina von Essen, Clemens Kühn, Horst Puschmann, Michael Bodensteiner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in IUCrJ, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. IndiumJournal of applied crystallography · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Florian MeurerUniversity of Regensburg, Universitätsstrasse 31, Regensburg, 93053 Bayern, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5689-5451
Carolina von EssenMerck Innovation Center, Merck KGaA, Frankfurter Strasse 250, Darmstadt, 64293 Hessen, Germany.
Clemens KühnMerck Innovation Center, Merck KGaA, Frankfurter Strasse 250, Darmstadt, 64293 Hessen, Germany.
Horst PuschmannOlexSys Ltd, Chemistry Department, Durham University, Durham DH1 3LE, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6819-9226
Michael BodensteinerUniversity of Regensburg, Universitätsstrasse 31, Regensburg, 93053 Bayern, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1850-5192

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The crystalline sponge method facilitates the X-ray structure determination of samples that do not crystallize or are too sparsely available to afford viable crystallization. By including these materials in a metal-organic framework, the structure of the guest molecules can be determined. Some of the inherent difficulties of this method are discussed and the use of Cu

Indexed as

copper Kβ radiationcrystalline spongemetal–organic frameworksX-ray analysis

Identifiers

PMID35546798
PMCPMC9067116

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.