Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35546781›Full record

ArticleBiophysical journal2022

Best practice for improved accuracy: A critical reassessment of van't Hoff analysis of melt curves.

Jacob M Majikes, Michael Zwolak, J Alexander Liddle

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biophysical journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jacob M MajikesMicrosystem and Nanotechnology Division, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, Maryland. Electronic address: jacob.majikes@nist.gov.
Michael ZwolakMicrosystem and Nanotechnology Division, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, Maryland.
J Alexander LiddleMicrosystem and Nanotechnology Division, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, Maryland. Electronic address: liddle@nist.gov.
National Institute of Standards and Technology · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biomolecular thermodynamics, particularly for DNA, are frequently determined via van't Hoff analysis of optically measured melt curves. Accurate and precise values of thermodynamic parameters are essential for the modeling of complex systems involving cooperative effects, such as RNA tertiary structure and DNA origami, because the uncertainties associated with each motif in a folding energy landscape can compound, significantly reducing the power of predictive models. We follow the sources of uncertainty as they propagate through a typical van't Hoff analysis to derive best practices for melt experiments and subsequent data analysis, assuming perfect signal baseline correction. With appropriately designed experiments and analysis, a van't Hoff approach can provide surprisingly high precision, e.g., enthalpies may be determined with a precision as low as 10

Indexed as

Thermodynamics

Identifiers

PMID35546781
PMCPMC9247556
OpenAlexW4229443250

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.