SynthesisCurrent cardiology reviews2022
Paravalvular Leak: A Systemic Review.
Synthesis in Current cardiology reviews, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Amplatzer-Based Transcatheter Paravalvular Leak Closure: A Narrative Review of Device Design, Procedural Strategy, Safety, and Outcomes.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Transcatheter Paravalvular Leak Closure Using Valve Frame Access.JACC. Case reports · 2026Article
- From Last Resort to Standard of Care: The Evolution and Future of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
- Paravalvular Leak After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement (TAVR): A Literature Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Contemporary Multi-modality Imaging of Prosthetic Aortic Valves.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Review
- Article
- Percutaneous versus surgical closure of paravalvular leaks in prosthetic valves: A cross-sectional comparison of clinical outcomes.Health science reports · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundParavalvular Leak (PVL) refers to the retrograde flow of blood in the space between an implanted cardiac valve and native tissue. These are unfortunately but luckily relatively uncommon complications of prosthetic valve replacement that, especially when moderate or severe, have important clinical consequences.
objectiveAddressing PVL requires a multidisciplinary team to properly diagnose this process and choose the corrective option most likely to result in success.
methodsA comprehensive literature search was undertaken to formulate this narrative review.
resultsThis review highlights the complex nature of PVL and the promising contemporary treatments available.
conclusionClinicians should be adept at recognizing PVL and characterizing it using multimodality imaging. Using the many available tools and a multidisciplinary approach should lead to favorable outcomes in patients with PVL.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.