Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35546610›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

The repeatability and agreement of biometric measurements by dual Scheimpflug device with integrated optical biometer.

Hassan Hashemi, Sara Sardari, Abbasali Yekta, Mehdi Khabazkhoob

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07325162 (Development of a Next-Generation Optical Biometer for Eyes With Cataract), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 54% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07325162 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Development of a Next-Generation Optical Biometer for Eyes With Cataract

TypeinterventionalSponsorCassini TechnologiesRan2025 to 2026Enrolled100ConditionsCataract and IOL SurgeryArmsNew Investigational Optical Biometer (Device), Comparator Device A (Cassini Ambient), omparator Device B (Argos)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Hassan HashemiNoor Research Center for Ophthalmic Epidemiology, Noor Eye Hospital, Tehran, Iran.
Sara SardariNoor Ophthalmology Research Center, Noor Eye Hospital, Tehran, Iran.
Abbasali YektaDepartment of Optometry, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
Mehdi KhabazkhoobDepartment of Basic Sciences, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. khabazkhoob@yahoo.com.
Noor Eye Hospital · IRMashhad University of Medical Sciences · IRShahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To determine the repeatability of biometric measurements by dual Scheimpflug Devices with Integrated Optical Biometers and its agreement with partial coherence interferometry according to the axial length (AL), and the presence of cataracts. The present population-based cross-sectional study was conducted on the geriatric population in Tehran. For participants, imaging was performed by dual Scheimpflug Devices with Integrated Optical Biometers (Galilei G6) and partial coherence interferometry (IOL Master 500). All measurements were performed by one person. In both normal and cataractous eyes, the ICC values were above 0.99 for three measurements of AL, intraocular lens (IOL) power target, anterior chamber depth (ACD), central corneal thickness (CCT), flat and steep keratometry readings, and mean total corneal power (MTCP). The repeatability coefficient for the AL measurements was 0.003 and 0.002 in eyes with and without cataracts, respectively. The mean difference of AL between IOL Master 500 and Galilei G6 in normal and cataractous eyes was 0.015 and -0.003 mm, respectively. The 95% limits of agreement (LoA) of AL between these two devices were -0.09 to 0.12 mm in normal and -0.09 to 0.08 mm in cataractous eyes. The 95% LoA of ACD between the two devices was -0.13 to 0.36 mm and -0.10 to 0.31 mm in eyes without and with cataracts, respectively. The 95% LoA of steep K between the two devices was -0.63 to 0.32 and -1.04 to 0.89 diopter in normal and cataractous eyes, respectively. The results of the present study indicate the high repeatability of Galilei G6 in ocular biometric measurements. Galilei biometric measurements, had a very high agreement with the IOL Master 500.

Indexed as

Axial Length, EyeCataractAgedAnterior ChamberBiometryCorneaCross-Sectional StudiesHumansInterferometryIranReproducibility of ResultsTomography, Optical Coherence

Identifiers

PMID35546610
PMCPMC9095872
OpenAlexW4280530754

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.