ArticleBMC public health2022
Determinants of adherence to personal preventive behaviours based on the health belief model: a cross-sectional study in South Korea during the initial stage of the COVID-19 pandemic.
Article in BMC public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.
- How populist-aligned views affect receipt of non-COVID-19-related public health interventions: a systematic review of quantitative studies.BMC public health · 2025Pooled it
- Post-pandemic shocks and non-suicidal self-injury risk in working-age adults: differential pathways via psychological distress and social support.BMC public health · 2026Article
- Effects of mothers' health beliefs on the dental status of schoolchildren in Taiwanese and immigrant women.BMC oral health · 2025Article
- Development and validation of a risk perception scale on acute respiratory infections for caregivers in long-term care facilities.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- Article
- Exploration of COVID-19 Pandemic Prevention Behaviors among Healthcare Workers.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Intervention and information effects at the individual level during the COVID-19 pandemic in Japan.PloS one · 2023Article
- Application of behavioral change theory and models on COVID-19 preventive behaviors, worldwide: A systematic review.SAGE open medicine · 2023Review
- [Factors associated with adherence to COVID-19 preventive behaviors in ELSA-Brasil participants].Cadernos de saude publica · 2023Article
- Adherence to Coronavirus Disease 2019 Preventive Measures in a Representative Sample of the Population of the Canton of Vaud, Switzerland.International journal of public health · 2022Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAlong with the rapid transmission of COVID-19, adherence to preventive behaviours plays a crucial role with respect to the control of COVID-19. However, different individuals' psychological characteristics and risk perception result in various forms of response to preventive behaviours. Based on the Health Belief Model, this study identifies the factors associated with preventive behaviours towards COVID-19 in South Korea during the initial stage of the COVID-19 pandemic.
methodsA cross-sectional study was conducted in April 2020 through an anonymous online survey. A total of 1207 people in the age bracket of 20-59 years participated in the survey. Single and multiple linear regression analyses were conducted to identify the determinants of preventive behaviours against COVID-19.
resultsThe following factors were associated with preventive behaviours towards COVID-19: female gender (β = .124, p < 0.001), has a master's degree or above (β = 0.065, p = 0.010), perceived susceptibility (β = .197, p < 0.001), self-efficacy (β = .404, p < 0.001), trust in radio (β = -.080, p = .006), trust in official government website (β = .057, p = .045), trust in social networks (β = .054, p = .033), and trust in family and friends (β = .068, p = .009), with an explanatory power of 41.5% (R
conclusionsTo flatten the epidemic curve, it is important to understand the public's risk perception and the motivation behind behavioural responses that aim to promote preventive behaviours among the public. Thus, this study calls for the provision of accessible and credible information sources and demonstrates a public health campaign that encourages the public's engagement in preventive behaviours towards COVID-19.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.