Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35546391›Full record

ArticleBMC gastroenterology2022

Methylated Septin9 has moderate diagnostic value in colorectal cancer detection in Chinese population: a multicenter study.

Dong-Cheng Lu, Qi-Fang Zhang, Li Li, Xian-Ke Luo, Bin Liang, Yi-Han Lu, Bang-Li Hu, Hai-Xing Jiang

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC gastroenterology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Observational
  5. Review
  6. Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026
    Article
  7. Review
  8. [Performance of Plasma Multigene Methylation Testing in Early Diagnosis of Colorectal Cancer].Sichuan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Sichuan University. Medical science edition · 2025
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Dong-Cheng LuDepartment of Gastroenterology, First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Shuangyong Road 6, Nanning, 530021, Guangxi, China.
Qi-Fang ZhangDepartment of Gastroenterology, Nanxishan Hospital of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, Guilin, 541002, China.
Li LiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Jiangbin Hospital of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, Nanning, 530021, China.
Xian-Ke LuoDepartment of Gastroenterology, Minzu Hospital of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, Nanning, 530001, China.
Bin LiangDepartment of Gastroenterology, First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Shuangyong Road 6, Nanning, 530021, Guangxi, China.
Yi-Han LuDepartment of Gastroenterology, First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Shuangyong Road 6, Nanning, 530021, Guangxi, China.
Bang-Li HuDepartment of Research, Guangxi Medical University Cancer Hospital, Hedi Road 71, Nanning, 530021, China. hubangli@gxmu.edu.cn.
Hai-Xing JiangDepartment of Gastroenterology, First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Shuangyong Road 6, Nanning, 530021, Guangxi, China. jihaxi@163.com.
First Affiliated Hospital of GuangXi Medical University · CNGuangxi Medical University · CNNanxi Mountain Hospital · CNRiverside Hospital of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region · CN

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 81860417National Natural Science Foundation of China 82160446
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe detection rate of methylated Septin9 (mSEPT9) in colorectal cancer (CRC) is varied greatly across the studies. This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic ability of mSEPT9 in CRC, and compare the diagnostic efficacy with fecal immunochemical test (FIT).

methods326 subjects from four centers were prospectively recruited, including 179 CRC and 147 non-CRC subjects. The plasma was collected for mSEPT9 and CEA, AFP, CA125, CA153 and CA199 test, and fecal samples for FIT tests. Sensitivity, specificity and area under the curve (AUC) of receiver operating characteristic curve were calculated to evaluate the diagnostic value of each biomarker.

resultsThe positive rate in mSEPT9 and FIT, and the level of CEA, CA125 and CA199 were significantly higher in CRC compared with non-CRC subjects. The mSEPT9 positive rate was not associated with TNM stage and tumor stage. The sensitivity, specificity and AUC of mSEPT9 in diagnostic CRC were 0.77, 0.88 and 0.82, respectively, while the value in FIT was 0.88, 0.80 and 0.83, respectively. mSEPT9 and FIT have higher AUC value than that of CEA, CA125 and CA199. Combination of both mSEPT9 and FIT positive increased sensitivity and AUC to 0.98 and 0.83, respectively, but the specificity was declined. mSEPT9 has a slightly low sensitivity in diagnosis of colon cancer (0.87) compared with rectal cancer (0.93).

conclusionmSEPT9 demonstrated moderate diagnostic value in CRC detection, which was similar to the FIT but superior to the CEA, CA125 and CA199. Combination of mSEPT9 and FIT further improved diagnostic sensitivity in CRC.

trial registrationChiCTR2000038319.

Indexed as

Colorectal NeoplasmsSeptinsBiomarkers, TumorCarcinoembryonic AntigenChinaEarly Detection of CancerHumansBiomarkers, TumorCarcinoembryonic AntigenSEPTIN9 protein, humanSeptinsColorectal cancerDiagnosisFecal immunochemical testMethylationSeptin9

Identifiers

PMID35546391
PMCPMC9097435
OpenAlexW4280573580

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.