ReviewInternational ophthalmology2022
Overview of the retina and imaging in patients with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2.
Review in International ophthalmology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- SARS-CoV-2 neurovascular invasion supported by Mendelian randomization.Journal of translational medicine · 2024Pooled it
- Effect of COVID-19 on Retinal and Choroidal Microvasculature in the Pediatric Population: A Literature Review.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Review
- Viral mechanisms, tropism, and clinical relevance regarding the ophthalmic manifestations of SARS-CoV-2 infection.International journal of ophthalmology · 2026Review
- The influence of SARS-CoV-2 spike protein exposure on retinal development in the human retinal organoids.Cell & bioscience · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe role of the human eye in severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-COV-2) is still under investigation. The pathophysiology of the ocular findings is arduous when dealing with critically ill Covid-19 patients with comorbidities. Multiorgan involvement and the effects of inflammation, infection and systemic treatment on the retina are complex, and comparison of studies is difficult. Most studies in human patients have investigated the anterior segment, whereas few reports deal with the posterior segment of the eye. The present review aims to evaluate the retinal manifestations and imaging features in COVID-19 patients.
methodsStudies on the retinal manifestations and retinal imaging in COVID-19 patients published through June 2021 were reviewed. We included cross-sectional and case-control studies, case series, case reports and correspondence in the analysis.
resultsFlame-shaped hemorrhages, cotton wool spots, augmented diameter and tortuosity of retinal vessels were found on funduscopic examination. Peripapillary, macular retinal nerve fiber layer and ganglion cell layer thickness alterations were reported on spectral domain optical coherence tomography. Reduced vessel density of the superficial and deep retinal capillary plexus on optical coherence tomography angiography was reported.
conclusionsRetinal complications may arise in COVID-19 patients. Although no consensus on presentation is currently available, retinal funduscopy and imaging has shown neuronal and vascular alterations. Systemic neurological complications and microangiopathy are associated with SARS-COV-2; thus, as the retina has a neuronal and vascular component, funduscopy and retinal imaging on COVID-19 patients can provide further insight to SARS-COV-2 disease and the follow-up of patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.