Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35546257›Full record

ArticleThe American journal of gastroenterology2022

Doctor, What Is the Best Crohn's Therapy?

Kim Isaacs, Sunanda Kane

Abstract readEditorialComment
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in The American journal of gastroenterology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 94% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kim IsaacsDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
Sunanda KaneDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Mayo Clinic · USUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

abstractWhen the only biologics were antitumor necrosis factor agents, it was not hard to treat our sick Crohn's patients. Now with multiple mechanisms of action, the therapeutic landscape is more broad but can be confusing. Trying to compare agents is difficult because head-to-head trials are lacking. A comparative effectiveness methodology allows for indirect comparisons of agents based on the outcome of interest. When deciding what agent is "best" for any specific patient, multiple factors have to be taken into consideration including the primary outcome of interest. In this study, the outcome of mucosal healing is considered.

Indexed as

Biological ProductsCrohn DiseaseAntibodies, MonoclonalBiological FactorsHumansMucous MembraneTreatment OutcomeAntibodies, MonoclonalBiological FactorsBiological Products

Identifiers

PMID35546257
OpenAlexW4280635344

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.