Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35546256›Full record

ArticleEcology letters2022

Future climate risks from stress, insects and fire across US forests.

William R L Anderegg, Oriana S Chegwidden, Grayson Badgley, Anna T Trugman, Danny Cullenward, John T Abatzoglou, Jeffrey A Hicke, Jeremy Freeman, Joseph J Hamman

Abstract readLetter
In one paragraph

Article in Ecology letters, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Tree regeneration trends in forests of the northeastern USA and their implications for resilience and restoration.Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Shifting equilibria in a warming boreal forest.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. New York State Climate Impacts Assessment Chapter 05: Ecosystems.Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · 2024
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Collaboration can preserve the integrity of gold standard carbon data from forest inventories.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  16. Charting the future of high forest low deforestation jurisdictions.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Climate change determines the sign of productivity trends in US forests.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

William R L AndereggSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6551-3331
Oriana S ChegwiddenCarbonPlan, San Francisco, California, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1376-3835
Grayson BadgleyBlackrock Forest, Cornwall, New York, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1011-4573
Anna T TrugmanDepartment of Geography, University of California, Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, California, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7903-9711
Danny CullenwardCarbonPlan, San Francisco, California, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6803-9572
John T AbatzoglouManagement of Complex Systems Department, University of California, Merced, Merced, California, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7599-9750
Jeffrey A HickeDepartment of Geography, University of Idaho, Moscow, Idaho, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0494-2866
Jeremy FreemanCarbonPlan, San Francisco, California, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7077-7972
Joseph J HammanCarbonPlan, San Francisco, California, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7479-8439

Funding

David and Lucile Packard FoundationMicrosoftNational Institute of Food and Agriculture 2018-67012-31496National Institute of Food and Agriculture 2018-67019-27850National Science Foundation 1714972National Science Foundation 1802880National Science Foundation 2003017National Science Foundation 2003205National Science Foundation 2017494National Science Foundation 2044937
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Forests are currently a substantial carbon sink globally. Many climate change mitigation strategies leverage forest preservation and expansion, but rely on forests storing carbon for decades to centuries. Yet climate-driven disturbances pose critical risks to the long-term stability of forest carbon. We quantify the climate drivers that influence wildfire and climate stress-driven tree mortality, including a separate insect-driven tree mortality, for the contiguous United States for current (1984-2018) and project these future disturbance risks over the 21st century. We find that current risks are widespread and projected to increase across different emissions scenarios by a factor of >4 for fire and >1.3 for climate-stress mortality. These forest disturbance risks highlight pervasive climate-sensitive disturbance impacts on US forests and raise questions about the risk management approach taken by forest carbon offset policies. Our results provide US-wide risk maps of key climate-sensitive disturbances for improving carbon cycle modeling, conservation and climate policy.

Indexed as

FiresForestsAnimalsCarbonClimate ChangeInsectaTreesUnited StatesCarbonbiotic agentscarbon cycledisturbancedroughtnature-based climate solutions

Identifiers

PMID35546256
PMCPMC9321543

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.