Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35546018›Full record

Trial reportActa bio-medica : Atenei Parmensis2022

Addition of a nutraceutical to montelukast or inhaled steroid in the treatment of wheezing during COVID-19 pandemic: a multicenter, open-label, randomized controlled trial.

Giuseppe Fabio Parisi, Sara Manti, Maria Papale, Alessandro Giallongo, Cristiana Indolfi, Michele Miraglia Del Giudice, Carmelo Salpietro, Amelia Licari, Gian Luigi Marseglia, Salvatore Leonardi

Open access · greenAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Acta bio-medica : Atenei Parmensis, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Montelukast in paediatric asthma and allergic rhinitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Giuseppe Fabio ParisiDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Catania. gf.parisi@policlinico.unict.it.
Sara MantiDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Catania. saramanti@hotmail.it.
Maria PapaleDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Catania. mariellapap@yahoo.it.
Alessandro GiallongoDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Catania. alegiallongo@hotmail.it.
Cristiana IndolfiDepartment of Woman, Child and Specialized Surgery, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy. cristianaind@hotmail.com.
Michele Miraglia Del GiudiceDepartment of Woman, Child and Specialized Surgery, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy. Michele.MIRAGLIADELGIUDICE@unicampania.it.
Carmelo SalpietroDepartment of Human Pathology in Adult and Developmental Age "Gaetano Barresi", Unit of Emergency Pediatric, University of Messina, "G. Martino" Policlinic, Italy. cdsalpietro@unime.it.
Amelia LicariPediatrics Department, Policlinico San Matteo, University of Pavia. amelia.licari@unipv.it.
Gian Luigi MarsegliaPediatrics Department, Policlinico San Matteo, University of Pavia. gl.marseglia@smatteo.pv.it.
Salvatore LeonardiDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Catania. leonardi@unict.it.
University of Catania · ITPoliclinico San Matteo Fondazione · ITUniversity of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli" · ITIstituto Ortopedico Gaetano Pini · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and aim Recurrent wheezing is often triggered by viral respiratory infections. The aims of our study were: i) to evaluate whether the addition of a nutraceutical (Leucodif®), could improve the efficacy of montelukast or inhaled steroids (ICS) compared to the single treatment; ii) to verify whether a treatment is more effective than another. Our study was biased by the COVID-19 pandemic, which resulted in a lockdown of almost two months in Italy. Methods The multicenter, open-label study enrolled 84 children aged 2-6 years diagnosed with recurrent wheezing and randomized them into four treatment arms for three months: ICS treatment; ii) montelukast; iii) montelukast + Leucodif; iv) ICS + Leucodif. Children were assessed at baseline and after one, two, and three months of treatment using the TRACK score for both the caregiver and the physician. Results Out of the 84 patients, 18 patients received ICS therapy, 22 patients ICS + Leucodif, 24 patients montelukast, and 20 patients montelukast + Leucodif. All four treatments resulted in a significant reduction in symptoms with no differences among the various groups. Conclusions Our study demonstrates that montelukast therapy appears to be equally effective as ICS therapy and that the addition of the nutraceutical Leucodif does not appear to improve the treatment outcome. However, in our opinion our study was strongly influenced and biased by the lockdown due to the COVID-19 pandemic, which inherently resulted in reduced exposure to the viruses that commonly cause respiratory infections in children.

Indexed as

Anti-Asthmatic AgentsAsthmaCOVID-19AcetatesAdministration, InhalationChildCommunicable Disease ControlCyclopropanesDietary SupplementsHumansPandemicsQuinolinesRespiratory SoundsSteroidsSulfidesAcetatesAnti-Asthmatic AgentsCyclopropanesmontelukastQuinolinesSteroidsSulfides

Identifiers

PMID35546018
PMCPMC9171851
OpenAlexW4280521240

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.