Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35545691›Full record

ReviewTransgenic research2022

Xenotransplantation becoming reality.

Konrad Fischer, Angelika Schnieke

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Transgenic research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
8.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Advances in Xenotransplantation: Evaluation of αGal-KO Porcine Livers and Lungs Using Normothermic Machine Perfusion in a Collaborative Perfusion Hub.Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation · 2025
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. CRISPR Technology: A Jewish Legal Perspective.Rambam Maimonides medical journal · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Konrad FischerChair of Livestock Biotechnology, School of Life Sciences, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Angelika SchniekeChair of Livestock Biotechnology, School of Life Sciences, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany. a.schnieke@tum.de.ORCID 0000-0002-5761-9635
Technical University of Munich · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To bridge the gap between organ demand and supply, xenotransplantation has long been considered as a realistic option for end-stage organ failure. Early this year this promise became reality for David Bennett Sr., the first patient whose own failing heart was replaced with a xeno-pig heart. To get here has been a rollercoaster ride of physiological hurdles seemingly impossible to overcome, technological breakthroughs and ethical and safety concerns. It started in 1984, with Stephanie Fae Beauclair, also known as baby Fae, receiving a baboon heart, which allowed her to survive for another 30 days. For ethical reasons primate work was soon abandoned in favour of the pig. But increased phylogenetic distance also brought with it an increased immunological incompatibility. It has been the development of ever more sophisticated genetic engineering tools, which brought down the physiological barriers, enabled humanisation of porcine organs and helped addressing safety concerns. This renewed the confidence in xenotransplantation, brought new funding opportunities and resulted finally in the first in human trial.

Indexed as

Genetic EngineeringPrimatesAnimalsHumansPhylogenySwineTransplantation, HeterologousBennett SeniorClinicalGenetic engineeringGenome editingOrgan transplantationPigsSwineXenotransplantation

Identifiers

PMID35545691
PMCPMC9135885
OpenAlexW4280523254

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.