ArticleScientific reports2022
The feasibility to use artificial intelligence to aid detecting focal liver lesions in real-time ultrasound: a preliminary study based on videos.
Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial intelligence and personalised medicine in liver cancer.Journal of hepatology · 2026Review
- Pilot feasibility study of deep learning-based detection of malignant liver lesions in intraoperative ultrasound imaging.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Article
- Automated deep learning for real-time focal liver lesions detection in ultrasound videos a multicenter study.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- Enhancing ultrasonographic detection of hepatocellular carcinoma with artificial intelligence: current applications, challenges and future directions.BMJ open gastroenterology · 2025Review
- Prediction of Seronegative Hashimoto's thyroiditis using machine learning models based on ultrasound radiomics: a multicenter study.BMC immunology · 2025Article
- Clinical Application of Artificial Intelligence in Ultrasound Imaging for Oncology.JMA journal · 2025Review
- Artificial intelligence in hepatocellular carcinoma screening: applications and challenges.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Review
- Application of artificial intelligence in the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma.eGastroenterology · 2023Review
- Liver Transplant in Patients with Hepatocarcinoma: Imaging Guidelines and Future Perspectives Using Artificial Intelligence.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Despite the wide availability of ultrasound machines for hepatocellular carcinoma surveillance, an inadequate number of expert radiologists performing ultrasounds in remote areas remains a primary barrier for surveillance. We demonstrated feasibility of artificial intelligence (AI) to aid in the detection of focal liver lesions (FLLs) during ultrasound. An AI system for FLL detection in ultrasound videos was developed. Data in this study were prospectively collected at a university hospital. We applied a two-step training strategy for developing the AI system by using a large collection of ultrasound snapshot images and frames from full-length ultrasound videos. Detection performance of the AI system was evaluated and then compared to detection performance by 25 physicians including 16 non-radiologist physicians and 9 radiologists. Our dataset contained 446 videos (273 videos with 387 FLLs and 173 videos without FLLs) from 334 patients. The videos yielded 172,035 frames with FLLs and 1,427,595 frames without FLLs for training on the AI system. The AI system achieved an overall detection rate of 89.8% (95%CI: 84.5-95.0) which was significantly higher than that achieved by non-radiologist physicians (29.1%, 95%CI: 21.2-37.0, p < 0.001) and radiologists (70.9%, 95%CI: 63.0-78.8, p < 0.001). Median false positive detection rate by the AI system was 0.7% (IQR: 1.3%). AI system operation speed reached 30-34 frames per second, showing real-time feasibility. A further study to demonstrate whether the AI system can assist operators during ultrasound examinations is warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.