Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35545628›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

The feasibility to use artificial intelligence to aid detecting focal liver lesions in real-time ultrasound: a preliminary study based on videos.

Thodsawit Tiyarattanachai, Terapap Apiparakoon, Sanparith Marukatat, Sasima Sukcharoen, Sirinda Yimsawad, Oracha Chaichuen, Siwat Bhumiwat, Natthaporn Tanpowpong, Nutcha Pinjaroen, Rungsun Rerknimitr and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Thodsawit TiyarattanachaiFaculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Terapap ApiparakoonCenter of Excellence for Innovation and Endoscopy in Gastrointestinal Oncology, Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Sanparith MarukatatImage Processing and Understanding Team, Artificial Intelligence Research Group, National Electronics and Computer Technology Center, Pathum Thani, Thailand.
Sasima SukcharoenDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, The Thai Red Cross Society, Bangkok, Thailand.
Sirinda YimsawadCenter of Excellence for Innovation and Endoscopy in Gastrointestinal Oncology, Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Oracha ChaichuenDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Siwat BhumiwatDepartment of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Natthaporn TanpowpongDepartment of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University and King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand.
Nutcha PinjaroenDepartment of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Rungsun RerknimitrCenter of Excellence for Innovation and Endoscopy in Gastrointestinal Oncology, Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Roongruedee ChaiteerakijCenter of Excellence for Innovation and Endoscopy in Gastrointestinal Oncology, Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand. roon.chaiteerakij@chula.md.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite the wide availability of ultrasound machines for hepatocellular carcinoma surveillance, an inadequate number of expert radiologists performing ultrasounds in remote areas remains a primary barrier for surveillance. We demonstrated feasibility of artificial intelligence (AI) to aid in the detection of focal liver lesions (FLLs) during ultrasound. An AI system for FLL detection in ultrasound videos was developed. Data in this study were prospectively collected at a university hospital. We applied a two-step training strategy for developing the AI system by using a large collection of ultrasound snapshot images and frames from full-length ultrasound videos. Detection performance of the AI system was evaluated and then compared to detection performance by 25 physicians including 16 non-radiologist physicians and 9 radiologists. Our dataset contained 446 videos (273 videos with 387 FLLs and 173 videos without FLLs) from 334 patients. The videos yielded 172,035 frames with FLLs and 1,427,595 frames without FLLs for training on the AI system. The AI system achieved an overall detection rate of 89.8% (95%CI: 84.5-95.0) which was significantly higher than that achieved by non-radiologist physicians (29.1%, 95%CI: 21.2-37.0, p < 0.001) and radiologists (70.9%, 95%CI: 63.0-78.8, p < 0.001). Median false positive detection rate by the AI system was 0.7% (IQR: 1.3%). AI system operation speed reached 30-34 frames per second, showing real-time feasibility. A further study to demonstrate whether the AI system can assist operators during ultrasound examinations is warranted.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceLiver NeoplasmsFeasibility StudiesHumansRadiologistsUltrasonography

Identifiers

PMID35545628
PMCPMC9095624

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.