Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35545508›Full record

ArticleMagnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine2023

The Utility of Arterial Transit Time Measurement for Evaluating the Hemodynamic Perfusion State of Patients with Chronic Cerebrovascular Stenosis or Occlusive Disease: Correlative Study between MR Imaging and

Kayo Takeuchi, Makoto Isozaki, Yoshifumi Higashino, Nobuyuki Kosaka, Ken-Ichiro Kikuta, Shota Ishida, Masayuki Kanamoto, Naoyuki Takei, Hidehiko Okazawa, Hirohiko Kimura

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Magnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Kayo TakeuchiDepartment of Radiology, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Fukui.
Makoto IsozakiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Fukui.
Yoshifumi HigashinoDepartment of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Fukui.
Nobuyuki KosakaDepartment of Radiology, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Fukui.
Ken-Ichiro KikutaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Fukui.
Shota IshidaRadiological Center, University of Fukui Hospital.
Masayuki KanamotoRadiological Center, University of Fukui Hospital.
Naoyuki TakeiGlobal MR Applications and Workflow, GE Healthcare.
Hidehiko OkazawaBiomedical Imaging Research Center, University of Fukui.
Hirohiko KimuraDepartment of Radiology, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Fukui.
University of Fukui · JPUniversity of Fukui Hospital · JPGeneral Electric (Spain) · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo verify whether arterial transit time (ATT) mapping can correct arterial spin labeling-cerebral blood flow (ASL-CBF) values and to verify whether ATT is a parameter that correlates with positron emission tomography (PET)-oxygen extraction fraction (OEF) and PET-mean transit time (MTT).

methodsEleven patients with unilateral major cerebral artery stenosis or occlusion underwent MRI and PET in the chronic or asymptomatic phase. ASL-MRI acquisitions were conducted with each of two post-label delay (PLD) settings (0.7s and 2.0s) using a pseudo-continuous ASL pulse sequence and 3D-spin echo spiral readout with vascular crusher gradient. ATT maps were obtained using a low-resolution pre-scan approach with five PLD settings. Using the ASL perfusion images and ATT mapping, ATT-corrected ASL-CBF images were obtained. Four kinds of ASL-CBF methods (PLD 0.7s with or without ATT correction and PLD 2.0s with or without ATT correction) were compared to PET-CBF, using vascular territory ROIs. ATT and OEF were compared for all ROIs, unaffected side ROIs, and affected side ROIs, respectively. ATT and MTT were compared by the ratio of the affected side to the unaffected side. Transit time-based ROIs were used for the comparison with ATT.

resultsComparing ASL-CBF and PET-CBF, the correlation was higher with ATT correction than without correction, and for a PLD of 2.0s compared with 0.7s. The best correlation was for PLD of 2.0s with ATT correction (R

conclusionLow-resolution ATT correction may increase the accuracy of ASL-CBF measurements in patients with unilateral major cerebral artery stenosis or occlusion. In addition, ATT itself might have a potential role in detecting compromised hemodynamic state.

Indexed as

Magnetic Resonance ImagingPositron-Emission TomographyCerebrovascular CirculationConstriction, PathologicHemodynamicsHumansPerfusionSpin LabelsSpin Labelsarterial spin labelingarterial transit timecerebral blood flowmagnetic resonance imagingoxygen extraction fraction

Identifiers

PMID35545508
PMCPMC10449557
OpenAlexW4280646499

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.