ArticleNeurologia medico-chirurgica2022
Prognostic Factors and Histopathological Features of Pediatric Intracranial Ependymomas: Nationwide Brain Tumor Registry-based Study of Japan.
Article in Neurologia medico-chirurgica, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Nationwide Brain Tumor Registry-based Study of Adult Intracranial Ependymoma in Japan.Neurologia medico-chirurgica · 2025Article
- Characterizing the Natural History of Pediatric Brain Tumors Presenting with Metastasis.Cancers · 2025Article
- Prognostic factors of pediatric ependymomas at a National Cancer Reference Center in Peru.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To assess the clinicopathological features and prognostic factors of pediatric intracranial ependymomas and to explore the current diagnostic practice, we analyzed clinical data from the Brain Tumor Registry of Japan (BTRJ). Data of fifty children under 18 years of age diagnosed with intracranial ependymoma were extracted from the BTRJ database. Cases were reviewed for overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), with attention to gender, preoperative Karnofsky performance status score, location of the tumor, the extent of resection, World Health Organization (WHO) histopathological grading, and adjuvant therapy. The median age at diagnosis was 6.1 years, ranging from 7 months to 17.6 years. Based on the WHO histopathological grading, 27 patients were classified under grade 2 (54%) and 23 patients were classified under grade 3 (46%). Gross total resection (GTR) was achieved in 30 patients (60%). The median follow-up time was 65 months. Five-year PFS and OS were 47.2 ± 7.3% and 73.3 ± 6.7%, respectively. GTR was associated with longer OS (P = 0.02). The histopathological grading was not an independent prognostic factor for the OS. Mitosis and microvascular proliferation were higher among patients with grade 3 than in those with grade 2, which aided in deciding the WHO grade. This nationwide study revealed the characteristics and outcomes of patients with childhood ependymomas. GTR was the factor most consistently associated with improved survival. In contrast, the histopathological grading in this cohort was not a significant prognostic factor. More reproducible and practical criteria for the diagnosis of intracranial ependymomas should be further pursued in future studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.