Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35545398›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2022

Community engagement in research in sub-Saharan Africa: approaches, barriers, facilitators, ethical considerations and the role of gender - a systematic review protocol.

Claudine Akondeng, Wepnyu Y Njamnshi, Henshaw Eyambe Mandi, Valirie Ndip Agbor, Luchuo Engelbert Bain, Alfred K Njamnshi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 6 institutions in 6 countries.

Claudine AkondengClinical Reseach Department, Brain Research Africa Initiative, Yaounde, Cameroon cmakondeng87@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0003-4641-2919
Wepnyu Y NjamnshiClinical Reseach Department, Brain Research Africa Initiative, Yaounde, Cameroon.
Henshaw Eyambe MandiTriangle Research Foundation (TRIFT), Limbe, Cameroon.
Valirie Ndip AgborClinical Trials and Epidemiology Unit, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6708-6852
Luchuo Engelbert Bain *Triangle Research Foundation (TRIFT), Limbe, Cameroon.
Alfred K Njamnshi *Clinical Reseach Department, Brain Research Africa Initiative, Yaounde, Cameroon.
Department of Education and Training · AULincoln University - Pennsylvania · USTriangle · USUniversité de Yaoundé I · CMUniversity of Oxford · GBWWF Cameroon · CM

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionMeaningful community engagement (CE) is increasingly being considered the major determinant of successful research, innovation and intervention uptake. Community leaders, policy makers and funders have expressed the need to engage communities in research. CE in research empowers the host community to participate in addressing its own health needs and health disparities while ensuring that researchers understand community priorities. Thus, appropriate CE opens a unique way to promote coproduction, coimplementation and coevaluation, which may strengthen both the sense of inclusion, ownership and the effectiveness of the research life-cycle. The aim of this review is to synthesise available evidence on how to engage communities in research in a gender-sensitive, ethical, culture-appropriate and sustainable way in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). This protocol has been developed following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols and follows the guidance provided by the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A combination of key text words and medical subject headings such as 'Community Engagement' or 'Community Involvement' will be used to search 009 databases for all literature published between 1 January 2000 and 31 July 2021. Citations retrieved from database searches will be exported into EndNote X9 to remove duplicate citations and imported into Rayyan QCRI for screening. Two independent reviewers will conduct the screening and data extraction process. Disagreements between review authors will be resolved through discussions, consensus a third reviewer serving as a tiebreaker. The risk of bias will be assessed using the 10-item Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Checklist for Qualitative Research. The three-staged process described by Thomas and Harden will be used for the thematic and narrative synthesis of findings. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This is a systematic review which uses already collected data thus ethical approval not required. Findings will be published in an open access peer-reviewed journal and presented in relevant conferences and workshops. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: This protocol has been submitted for registration in PROSPERO and has been published under registration number CRD42021282503 .

Indexed as

Mass ScreeningPeer ReviewHumansMeta-Analysis as TopicMoralsQualitative ResearchResearch DesignSystematic Reviews as TopicETHICS (see Medical Ethics)International health servicesProtocols & guidelinesPublic healthQuality in health care

Identifiers

PMID35545398
PMCPMC9096545
OpenAlexW4280542937

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.