Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35545397›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2022

Continuity of community-based healthcare provision during COVID-19: a multicountry interrupted time series analysis.

Madeleine Ballard, Helen E Olsen, Anoushka Millear, Jane Yang, Caroline Whidden, Amanda Yembrick, Dianne Thakura, Afra Nuwasiima, Molly Christiansen, Daniele J Ressler and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
12.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. COVID-19 impacts on healthcare access in sub-Saharan Africa: an overview.The journal of venomous animals and toxins including tropical diseases · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Madeleine BallardCommunity Health Impact Coalition, London, UK madeleine.ballard@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0003-0107-4047
Helen E OlsenMedic Mobile, San Francisco, California, USA.
Anoushka MillearMedic Mobile, San Francisco, California, USA.
Jane YangMuso, Bamako, Mali.
Caroline WhiddenMuso, Bamako, Mali.
Amanda YembrickMedic Mobile, San Francisco, California, USA.
Dianne ThakuraLiving Goods, Nairobi, Kenya.
Afra NuwasiimaLiving Goods, Kampala, Uganda.
Molly ChristiansenLiving Goods, Nairobi, Kenya.
Daniele J ResslerLwala Community Alliance, Rongo, Kenya.
Wycliffe Okoth OmwandaLwala Community Alliance, Rongo, Kenya.
Diego LassalaMuso, Bamako, Mali.
Daniel PalazuelosDepartment of Global Health and Social Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Carey WestgateCommunity Health Impact Coalition, New York, New York, USA.
Fabien MunyanezaPartners In Health, Neno, Malawi.
Mali-Folkecenter · MLT-Mobile (United States) · USCommunity Partners · USCommunity Impact · USMount Sinai Health System · USPartners In Health · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPandemics often precipitate declines in essential health service utilisation, which can ultimately kill more people than the disease outbreak itself. There is some evidence, however, that the presence of adequately supported community health workers (CHWs), that is, financially remunerated, trained, supplied and supervised in line with WHO guidelines, may blunt the impact of health system shocks. Yet, adequate support for CHWs is often missing or uneven across countries. This study assesses whether adequately supported CHWs can maintain the continuity of essential community-based health service provision during the COVID-19 pandemic.

methodsInterrupted time series analysis. Monthly routine data from 27 districts across four countries in sub-Saharan Africa were extracted from CHW and facility reports for the period January 2018-June 2021. Descriptive analysis, null hypothesis testing, and segmented regression analysis were used to assess the presence and magnitude of a possible disruption in care utilisation after the earliest reported cases of COVID-19.

resultsCHWs across all sites were supported in line with the WHO Guideline and received COVID-19 adapted protocols, training and personal protective equipment within 45 days after the first case in each country. We found no disruptions to the coverage of proactive household visits or integrated community case management (iCCM) assessments provided by these prepared and protected CHWs, as well as no disruptions to the speed with which iCCM was received, pregnancies were registered or postnatal care received.

conclusionCHWs who were equipped and prepared for the pandemic were able to maintain speed and coverage of community-delivered care during the pandemic period. Given that the majority of CHWs globally remain unpaid and largely unsupported, this paper suggests that the opportunity cost of not professionalising CHWs may be larger than previously estimated, particularly in light of the inevitability of future pandemics.

Indexed as

COVID-19Community Health ServicesCommunity Health WorkersDelivery of Health CareHumansInterrupted Time Series AnalysisPandemicsCommunity child healthCOVID-19Health policy

Identifiers

PMID35545397
PMCPMC9096055
OpenAlexW4280550602

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.