Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35545272›Full record

ArticleBMJ open quality2022

Impact of family-centred postnatal training on maternal and neonatal health and care practices in district hospitals in two states in India: a pre-post study.

Sehj Kashyap, Amanda F Spielman, Nikhil Ramnarayan, Sahana Sd, Rashmi Pant, Baljit Kaur, Rajkumar N, Ramaswamy Premkumar, Tanmay Singh, Bhanu Pratap and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open quality, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Community-Based Model:Iranian journal of nursing and midwifery research
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 7 institutions in 4 countries.

Sehj Kashyap *Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Amanda F Spielman *Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, Florida, USA.
Nikhil RamnarayanOrganisation and Development, Noora Health, San Francisco, California, USA.
Sahana SdReasearch, Aurora Health Innovation, Bengaluru, India.
Rashmi PantData Science, ShriSankhyam Analytics and Research LLP, New Delhi, India.
Baljit KaurDepartment of Health and Family Welfare, Government of Punjab, Chandigarh, Punjab, India.
Rajkumar NDepartment of Health and Family Welfare, Government of Karnataka, Bangalore, Karnataka, India.
Ramaswamy PremkumarIndependent Consultant, Vellore, Tamilnadu, India.
Tanmay SinghTraining, Aurora Health Innovations LLP, Bangalore, India.
Bhanu PratapTraining, Aurora Health Innovations LLP, Bangalore, India.
Anand KumarTraining, Aurora Health Innovations LLP, Bangalore, India.
Shahed AlamOrganisation and Development, Noora Health, San Francisco, California, USA.
Seema MurthyResearch, Aurora Health Innovations LLP, Bangalore, India s.m.seema@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-7755-2407
Health Innovations (United States) · USSNV Netherlands Development Organisation · NLAurora Health Care · USDuke University · USGovernment of Karnataka · INGovernment of Pakistan · PKUniversity of Miami · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectivesThe Care Companion Program (CCP) is an in-hospital multitopic skill-based training programme provided to families to improve postdischarge maternal and neonatal health. The states of Punjab and Karnataka in India piloted the programme in 12 district hospitals in July 2017, and no study to date has evaluated its impact.

methodsWe compared telephonically self-reported maternal and neonatal care practices and health outcomes before and after the launch of the CCP programme in 11 facilities. Families in the preintervention group delivered between May to June 2017 (N=1474) while those in the intervention group delivered between August and October 2017 (N=3510). Programme effects were expressed as adjusted risk ratios obtained from logistic regression models.

resultsAt 2-week postdelivery, the practice of dry cord care improved by 4% (RR=1.04, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.06) and skin-to-skin care by 78% (RR=1.78, 95% CI 1.37 to 2.27) in the postintervention group as compared with preintervention group. Furthermore, newborn complications reduced by 16% (RR=0.84, 95% CI 0.76 to 0.91), mother complications by 12% (RR=0.88, 95% CI 0.79 to 0.97) and newborn readmissions by 56% (RR=0.44, 95% CI 0.31 to 0.61). Outpatient visits increased by 27% (RR=1.27, 95% CI 1.10 to 1.46). However, the practice of exclusive breastfeeding, unrestricted maternal diet, hand-hygiene and being instructed on warning signs were not statistically different.

conclusionPostnatal care should incorporate predischarge training of families. Our findings demonstrate that it is possible to improve maternal and neonatal care practices and outcomes through a family-centered programme integrated into public health facilities in low and middle-income countries.

Indexed as

Hospitals, DistrictInfant HealthAftercareFemaleHumansIndiaInfant, NewbornPatient Dischargehealth behaviormaternal health servicespatient-centred carepatient education

Identifiers

PMID35545272
PMCPMC9092167
OpenAlexW4280639186

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.