Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35545248›Full record

ArticleClinics in shoulder and elbow2022

Patient satisfaction in shoulder arthroscopy: telemedicine vs. clinic follow-up visits.

Elliot D K Cha, Corey Suraci, Daniel Petrosky, Rebeca Welsh, Gustin Reynolds, Michael Scharf, Joseph Brutico, Gabriella SantaLucia, Joseph Choi

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinics in shoulder and elbow, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Elliot D K ChaGeisinger Commonwealth School of Medicine, Scranton, PA, USA.
Corey SuraciGeisinger Commonwealth School of Medicine, Scranton, PA, USA.
Daniel PetroskyGeisinger Commonwealth School of Medicine, Scranton, PA, USA.
Rebeca WelshGeisinger Commonwealth School of Medicine, Scranton, PA, USA.
Gustin ReynoldsGeisinger Commonwealth School of Medicine, Scranton, PA, USA.
Michael ScharfGeisinger Commonwealth School of Medicine, Scranton, PA, USA.
Joseph BruticoGeisinger Commonwealth School of Medicine, Scranton, PA, USA.
Gabriella SantaLuciaGeisinger Commonwealth School of Medicine, Scranton, PA, USA.
Joseph ChoiDepartment of Orthopedics, Guthrie Clinic, Sayre, PA, USA.
Geisinger Commonwealth School of Medicine · USGuthrie Foundation · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe use of telemedicine for postoperative visits is increasing, especially in rural areas. Few studies have investigated its use for arthroscopic shoulder patients. This study aims to evaluate patient satisfaction with telemedicine for postoperative clinic visits following arthroscopic shoulder procedures in a rural setting.

methodsPatients were prospectively enrolled using the following exclusion criteria: <18 years, open procedures, and non-compliance follow-up at 6 weeks postoperatively. All patients completed a 13-question satisfaction survey, while telemedicine patients completed an additional, separate seven-question survey. Patients who switched groups completed a four-question prompt to determine the reasons for switching. Differences between groups were evaluated by either Student t-test or Mann-Whitney U-test.

resultsThe study enrolled 32 patients, with five patients following up by telemedicine and 27 in person. Age and distance from clinic were similar between patients who were assigned to the telemedicine group, completed the telemedicine visit, and opted for in-person visits (all p>0.05). Patient satisfaction did not vary significantly based on care by the surgeon, concerns being addressed, thoroughness of visit, overall clinical assessment at a prior visit, and improvements in pain and physical function (all p>0.05). Among patients who opted out of telemedicine visits, the most common reason was a preference to meet in-person but these patients agreed that telemedicine visits are a good idea.

conclusionsRegardless of type of follow-up, individuals reported similar levels of satisfaction with treatment during the visit and improvements in pain and physical function.

Indexed as

ArthroscopyShoulderTelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID35545248
PMCPMC9185120
OpenAlexW4223992544

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.