Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35544991›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of nursing studies2022

"Should I stay or should I go?" Nurses' perspectives about working during the Covid-19 pandemic's first wave in the United States: A summative content analysis combined with topic modeling.

Allison Squires, Maya Clark-Cutaia, Marcus D Henderson, Gavin Arneson, Philip Resnik

Erratum issuedOpen access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of nursing studies, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
16.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Three Missed Critical Nursing Care Processes on Labor and Delivery Units During the COVID-19 Pandemic.Journal of obstetric, gynecologic, and neonatal nursing : JOGNN · 2023
    Article
  14. Nurses' Perceptions of Ethical Conflicts When Caring for Patients with COVID-19.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Allison SquiresRory Meyers College of Nursing, New York University, 433 First Avenue, 6th Floor, New York, NY 10010, United States of America. Electronic address: aps6@nyu.edu.
Maya Clark-CutaiaRory Meyers College of Nursing, New York University, 433 First Avenue, 6th Floor, New York, NY 10010, United States of America.
Marcus D HendersonSchool of Nursing, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, United States of America.
Gavin ArnesonRory Meyers College of Nursing, New York University, 433 First Avenue, 6th Floor, New York, NY 10010, United States of America.
Philip ResnikDepartment of Linguistics and Institute for Advanced Computer Studies, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, United States of America.
New York University · USJohns Hopkins University · USUniversity of Maryland, College Park · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic had its first peak in the United States between April and July of 2020, with incidence and prevalence rates of the virus the greatest in the northeastern coast of the country. At the time of study implementation, there were few studies capturing the perspectives of nurses working the frontlines of the pandemic in any setting as research output in the United States focused largely on treating the disease.

objectiveThe purpose of this study was to capture the perspectives of nurses in the United States working the frontlines of the COVID-19 pandemic's first wave. We were specifically interested in examining the impact of the pandemic on nurses' roles, professional relationships, and the organizational cultures of their employers.

designWe conducted an online qualitative study with a pragmatic design to capture the perspectives of nurses working during the first wave of the United States COVID-19 pandemic. Through social networking recruitment, frontline nurses from across the country were invited to participate. Participants provided long form, text-based responses to four questions designed to capture their experiences. A combination of Latent Dirichlet Allocation--a natural language processing technique--along with traditional summative content analysis techniques were used to analyze the data.

settingThe United States during the COVID-19 pandemic's first wave between May and July of 2020.

resultsA total of 318 nurses participated from 29 out of 50 states, with 242 fully completing all questions. Findings suggested that the place of work mattered significantly in terms of the frontline working experience. It influenced role changes, risk assumption, interprofessional teamwork experiences, and ultimately, likelihood to leave their jobs or the profession altogether. Organizational culture and its influence on pandemic response implementation was a critical feature of their experiences.

conclusionsFindings suggest that organizational performance during the pandemic may be reflected in nursing workforce retention as the risk for workforce attrition appears high. It was also clear from the reports that nurses appear to have assumed higher occupational risks during the pandemic when compared to other providers. The 2020 data from this study also offered a number of signals about potential threats to the stability and sustainability of the US nursing workforce that are now manifesting. The findings underscore the importance of conducting health workforce research during a crisis in order to discern the signals of future problems or for long-term crisis response. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: Healthcare leaders made the difference for nurses during the pandemic. How many nurses leave their employer in the next year will tell you who was good, who wasn't.

Indexed as

COVID-19NursesNursing StaffHumansNurse's RolePandemicsUnited StatesCOVID-19Health care organizationsHealth care systemsHealth policyHealth workforceNursesNursingPandemic

Identifiers

PMID35544991
PMCPMC9020864
OpenAlexW4224257803

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.