Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35544897›Full record

ArticleEinstein (Sao Paulo, Brazil)2022

Relation between red blood cell distribution width and acute kidney injury in patients with sepsis.

Marina Larissa Vettorello Ramires, Manoela Fidelis Batista Leite, Daniel Zu Yow Lo, Leonardo Bonilla da Silveira, Leonardo José Rolim Ferraz, Andreia Pardini, Araci Massami Sakashita, Andrea Tiemi Kondo, Guilherme Benfatti Olivato, Marcelino de Souza Durão Junior and 4 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Einstein (Sao Paulo, Brazil), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Marina Larissa Vettorello RamiresFaculdade Israelita de Ciências da Saúde Albert Einstein, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1822-1349
Manoela Fidelis Batista LeiteFaculdade Israelita de Ciências da Saúde Albert Einstein, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0498-1251
Daniel Zu Yow LoFaculdade Israelita de Ciências da Saúde Albert Einstein, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0022-2258
Leonardo Bonilla da SilveiraFaculdade Israelita de Ciências da Saúde Albert Einstein, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6768-8554
Leonardo José Rolim FerrazHospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9044-5035
Andreia PardiniHospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9810-0100
Araci Massami SakashitaHospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2359-0157
Andrea Tiemi KondoHospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4228-8503
Guilherme Benfatti OlivatoHospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3444-5433
Marcelino de Souza Durão JuniorHospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6044-6694
Adelson Marçal RodriguesUniversidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1220-1806
Daniela Mendes ChiloffUniversidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6003-2106
Danilo Candido de AlmeidaUniversidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3661-2124
Miguel Angelo GoesUniversidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7687-3826
Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein · BRUniversidade Federal de São Paulo · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe objective of the present study is to evaluate the association of red blood cell distribution width with acute kidney injury in sepsis.

methodsThis is a retrospective study of 849 critically ill patients with sepsis in intensive care unit. Demographic data, renal function, inflammation, complete blood count, and acid-base parameters were compared between acute kidney injury and non-acute kidney injury groups. Therefore, a multivariate analysis was performed to observe independent predictive factors.

resultsComparatively, higher levels of C-reactive protein, lactate, red blood cell distribution width, and Simplified Acute Physiology Score 3 were found in the acute kidney injury group. The study showed a higher frequency of women, hemoglobin (Hgb) concentration, platelets, bicarbonate and PaO2/FiO2 ratio in the non-acute kidney injury group. In addition, there was an independent association of comorbidity-chronic kidney disease [OR 3.549, 95%CI: 1.627-7.743; p<0.001], urea [OR 1.047, 95%CI: 1.036-1.058; p<0.001] and RDW [OR 1.158, 95%CI: 1.045-1.283; p=0.005] with acute kidney injury in sepsis patients.

conclusionAs an elective risk factor, red blood cell distribution width was independently associated with sepsis-related acute kidney injury. Thus, red blood cell distribution width acts like a predictive factor for sepsis-induced acute kidney injury in intensive care unit admission.

Indexed as

Acute Kidney InjurySepsisErythrocytesFemaleHumansIntensive Care UnitsMalePrognosisRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID35544897
PMCPMC9071258
OpenAlexW4285298871

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.