Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35544856›Full record

ReviewMemorias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz2022

Why do we still have not a vaccine against Chagas disease?

Erney Plessmann Camargo, Ricardo Tostes Gazzinelli, Carlos Médicis Morel, Alexander Roberto Precioso

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Memorias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Vaccines against chronicExpert review of vaccines · 2026
    Review
  2. The time has come for a vaccine against Chagas disease.Lancet regional health. Americas · 2025
    Review
  3. Fighting Strategies Against Chagas' Disease: A Review.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. A Review on the Immunological Response againstPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Erney Plessmann CamargoUniversidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0011-5871
Ricardo Tostes GazzinelliFundação Oswaldo Cruz-Fiocruz, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.
Carlos Médicis MorelFundação Oswaldo Cruz-Fiocruz, Centro de Desenvolvimento Tecnológico em Saúde, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.
Alexander Roberto PreciosoInstituto Butantan, Centro de Segurança Clínica e Gestão de Riscos, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.
Fundação Oswaldo Cruz · BRInstituto Butantan · BRUniversidade de São Paulo · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This review does not intend to convey detailed experimental or bibliographic data. Instead, it expresses the informal authors' personal views on topics that range from basic research on antigens and experimental models for Trypanosoma cruzi infection to vaccine prospects and vaccine production. The review also includes general aspects of Chagas' disease control and international and national policies on the subject. The authors contributed equally to the paper.

Indexed as

Chagas DiseaseTrypanosoma cruziVaccinesAntigensHumansAntigensVaccines

Identifiers

PMID35544856
PMCPMC9088429
OpenAlexW4285223538

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.