Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35544644›Full record

ArticleScience advances2022

CancerVar: An artificial intelligence-empowered platform for clinical interpretation of somatic mutations in cancer.

Quan Li, Zilin Ren, Kajia Cao, Marilyn M Li, Kai Wang, Yunyun Zhou

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Science advances, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Guideline
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Quan LiPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5G2C1, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-0565-9045
Zilin RenRaymond G. Perelman Center for Cellular and Molecular Therapeutics, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3621-1024
Kajia CaoDivision of Genomic Diagnostics, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
Marilyn M LiDivision of Genomic Diagnostics, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4253-2369
Kai WangRaymond G. Perelman Center for Cellular and Molecular Therapeutics, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5585-982X
Yunyun ZhouRaymond G. Perelman Center for Cellular and Molecular Therapeutics, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1689-8575

Funding

Deep phenotyping in Electronic Health Records for Genomic MedicineR01LM012895 · NLM · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI WANG, KAI, WENG, CHUNHUA · 2018 to 2021
$3.3M
Detection and annotation of structural variants from long-read sequencingR01GM132713 · NIGMS · CHILDREN'S HOSP OF PHILADELPHIA · PI WANG, KAI · 2019 to 2022
$1.9M
Integrate cancer genomics data in geneticstudies and diagnosis of developmental disordersR01GM120609 · NIGMS · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI SHEN, YUFENG · 2017 to 2021
$1.7M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM120609NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM132713NLM NIH HHS R01 LM012895
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Several knowledgebases are manually curated to support clinical interpretations of thousands of hotspot somatic mutations in cancer. However, discrepancies or even conflicting interpretations are observed among these databases. Furthermore, many previously undocumented mutations may have clinical or functional impacts on cancer but are not systematically interpreted by existing knowledgebases. To address these challenges, we developed CancerVar to facilitate automated and standardized interpretations for 13 million somatic mutations based on the AMP/ASCO/CAP 2017 guidelines. We further introduced a deep learning framework to predict oncogenicity for these variants using both functional and clinical features. CancerVar achieved satisfactory performance when compared to several independent knowledgebases and, using clinically curated datasets, demonstrated practical utility in classifying somatic variants. In summary, by integrating clinical guidelines with a deep learning framework, CancerVar facilitates clinical interpretation of somatic variants, reduces manual work, improves consistency in variant classification, and promotes implementation of the guidelines.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceNeoplasmsHumansMutation

Identifiers

PMID35544644
PMCPMC9075800

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.