Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35544561›Full record

ReviewScience advances2022

Theory-guided experimental design in battery materials research.

Alex Yong Sheng Eng, Chhail Bihari Soni, Yanwei Lum, Edwin Khoo, Zhenpeng Yao, S K Vineeth, Vipin Kumar, Jun Lu, Christopher S Johnson, Christopher Wolverton and 1 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Science advances, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Boosting LiNano-micro letters · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. National science review · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. TowardAnalytical chemistry · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Alex Yong Sheng EngInstitute of Materials Research and Engineering, Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR), 2 Fusionopolis Way, Innovis, Singapore 138634, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0001-9577-1681
Chhail Bihari SoniDepartment of Energy Science and Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Delhi, Hauz Khas, New Delhi 110 016, India.ORCID 0000-0002-9688-2110
Yanwei LumInstitute of Materials Research and Engineering, Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR), 2 Fusionopolis Way, Innovis, Singapore 138634, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0001-7261-2098
Edwin KhooInstitute for Infocomm Research, Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR), 1 Fusionopolis Way, Connexis, Singapore 138632, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0002-3171-7982
Zhenpeng YaoThe State Key Laboratory of Metal Matrix Composites, School of Materials Science and Engineering, and Center of Hydrogen Science, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, P. R. China.ORCID 0000-0001-8286-8257
S K VineethDepartment of Energy Science and Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Delhi, Hauz Khas, New Delhi 110 016, India.ORCID 0000-0003-2335-7144
Vipin KumarDepartment of Energy Science and Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Delhi, Hauz Khas, New Delhi 110 016, India.
Jun LuChemical Sciences and Engineering Division, Argonne National Laboratory, Lemont, IL 60439, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0858-8577
Christopher S JohnsonChemical Sciences and Engineering Division, Argonne National Laboratory, Lemont, IL 60439, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4357-6889
Christopher WolvertonDepartment of Materials Science and Engineering, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL 60208, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2248-474X
Zhi Wei SehInstitute of Materials Research and Engineering, Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR), 2 Fusionopolis Way, Innovis, Singapore 138634, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0003-0953-567X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A reliable energy storage ecosystem is imperative for a renewable energy future, and continued research is needed to develop promising rechargeable battery chemistries. To this end, better theoretical and experimental understanding of electrochemical mechanisms and structure-property relationships will allow us to accelerate the development of safer batteries with higher energy densities and longer lifetimes. This Review discusses the interplay between theory and experiment in battery materials research, enabling us to not only uncover hitherto unknown mechanisms but also rationally design more promising electrode and electrolyte materials. We examine specific case studies of theory-guided experimental design in lithium-ion, lithium-metal, sodium-metal, and all-solid-state batteries. We also offer insights into how this framework can be extended to multivalent batteries. To close the loop, we outline recent efforts in coupling machine learning with high-throughput computations and experiments. Last, recommendations for effective collaboration between theorists and experimentalists are provided.

Identifiers

PMID35544561
PMCPMC9094674

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.