Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35544552›Full record

ArticlePloS one2022

Maize productivity and soil nutrients variations by the application of vermicompost and biochar.

Khadim Dawar, Ahtesham Khan, Ishaq Ahmad Mian, Bushra Khan, Shamsher Ali, Sagheer Ahmad, Piotr Szulc, Shah Fahad, Rahul Datta, Ashraf Atef Hatamleh and 2 more

RetractedOpen access · goldAbstract readRetracted Publication
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 7 institutions in 5 countries.

Khadim DawarDepartment of Soil and Environmental Science, The University of Agriculture Peshawar, Peshawar, Pakistan.
Ahtesham KhanDepartment of Soil and Environmental Science, The University of Agriculture Peshawar, Peshawar, Pakistan.
Ishaq Ahmad MianDepartment of Soil and Environmental Science, The University of Agriculture Peshawar, Peshawar, Pakistan.
Bushra KhanDepartment of Soil and Environmental Sciences, University of Peshawar, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan.
Shamsher AliDepartment of Soil and Environmental Sciences, Amir Muhammad Khan Campus Mardan, The University of Agriculture, Peshawar, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan.
Sagheer AhmadFaculty of Agricultural Sciences and Technology, Department of Agronomy, Bahauddin Zakariya University, Multan, Punjab, Pakistan.
Piotr SzulcDepartment of Agronomy, Poznan University of Life Sciences, Dojazd, Poznan, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-9670-3231
Shah FahadHainan Key Laboratory for Sustainable Utilization of Tropical Bioresource, College of Tropical Crops, Hainan University, Haikou, 570228, China.
Rahul DattaFaculty of Forestry and Wood Technology, Department of Geology and Pedology, Mendel University in Brno, Zemedelska1, Brno, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0001-9001-2555
Ashraf Atef HatamlehDepartment of Botany and Microbiology, College of Science, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-9623-3110
Munirah Abdullah Al-DosaryDepartment of Botany and Microbiology, College of Science, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Subhan DanishDepartment of Agronomy, The University of Haripur, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan.ORCID 0000-0002-6182-6207
The University of Agriculture, Peshawar · PKBahauddin Zakariya University · PKKing Saud University · SAHainan University · CNMendel University in Brno · CZUniversity of Life Sciences in Poznań · PLUniversity of Peshawar · PK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Poor soil organic matter is one of the major causes of the deterioration of soil health. Most soils fertility is also decreased when enough organic carbon is not present in the soil. Maize is most susceptible to this poor soil fertility status. A significant amount of maize growth and yield is lost when it is cultivated in low organic matter and poor fertility soil. To overcome this issue organic amendments can play an imperative role. Biochar and vermicompost are organic amendments that can not only improve organic residues but also increase soil nutrient concentration. The current experiment was conducted to explore the sole and combined application of both organic amendments with recommended NPK fertilizer. Four treatments were tested i.e., control, biochar (BC1), vermicompost (VC1) and VC1+BC1 with and without nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P) and potassium (K) in the experiment. Results showed that VC1+BC1+NPK performed significantly best for improvement in maize plant height (6.25 and 3.00%), 1000 grains weight (30.48 and 29.40%), biological yield (18.86 and 43.12%) and grains yield (30.58 and 39.59%) compared to BC0+VC0+NPK and control respectively. A significant improvement in soil N, P and K also validated the efficacious role of VC1+BC1+NPK over BC0+VC0+NPK and control. Treatment VC1+BC1+NPK is recommended for the achievement of better maize growth and yield in poor organic matter soils. More investigations are suggested in variable climatic conditions to declare VC1+BC1+NPK as the best amendment compared to control for enhancing soil N, P and K status as well as maize productivity.

Indexed as

SoilZea maysAgricultureCharcoalFertilizersNutrientsbiocharCharcoalFertilizersNutrientsSoil

Identifiers

PMID35544552
PMCPMC9094532
OpenAlexW4280601164

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.