Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35544541›Full record

ArticlePloS one2022

Multicenter international assessment of a SARS-CoV-2 RT-LAMP test for point of care clinical application.

Suying Lu, David Duplat, Paula Benitez-Bolivar, Cielo León, Stephany D Villota, Eliana Veloz-Villavicencio, Valentina Arévalo, Katariina Jaenes, Yuxiu Guo, Seray Cicek and 14 more

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Enhanced Specificity in Colorimetric LAMP Assay forJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  5. Development and field validation of a reverse transcription loop-mediated isothermal amplification assay (RT-LAMP) for the rapid detection of chikungunya virus in patient and mosquito samples.Clinical microbiology and infection : the official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

24 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Suying LuLunenfeld Tanenbaum Research Institute, Mt Sinai Hospital, Sinai Health System, Toronto, ON, Canada.
David DuplatCentro de Investigaciones en Microbiología y Parasitología Tropical (CIMPAT), Department of Biological Sciences, Universidad de los Andes, Bogotá, Colombia.ORCID 0000-0003-1054-5664
Paula Benitez-BolivarCentro de Investigaciones en Microbiología y Parasitología Tropical (CIMPAT), Department of Biological Sciences, Universidad de los Andes, Bogotá, Colombia.ORCID 0000-0002-1576-0403
Cielo LeónCentro de Investigaciones en Microbiología y Parasitología Tropical (CIMPAT), Department of Biological Sciences, Universidad de los Andes, Bogotá, Colombia.
Stephany D VillotaCentro de Investigación en Enfermedades Infecciosas y Vectoriales (CIREV), Instituto Nacional de Investigación en Salud Pública, Quito, Ecuador.ORCID 0000-0002-3250-6589
Eliana Veloz-VillavicencioCentro de Investigación en Enfermedades Infecciosas y Vectoriales (CIREV), Instituto Nacional de Investigación en Salud Pública, Quito, Ecuador.ORCID 0000-0003-2234-2055
Valentina ArévaloCentro de Investigación en Enfermedades Infecciosas y Vectoriales (CIREV), Instituto Nacional de Investigación en Salud Pública, Quito, Ecuador.ORCID 0000-0002-0088-4200
Katariina JaenesLeslie Dan Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Yuxiu GuoLSK Technologies Inc., Kitchener, Canada.
Seray CicekLSK Technologies Inc., Kitchener, Canada.
Lucas RobinsonVelocity, University of Waterloo, Kitchener, ON, Canada.
Philippos PeidisLunenfeld Tanenbaum Research Institute, Mt Sinai Hospital, Sinai Health System, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Joel D PearsonLunenfeld Tanenbaum Research Institute, Mt Sinai Hospital, Sinai Health System, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Jim WoodgettLunenfeld Tanenbaum Research Institute, Mt Sinai Hospital, Sinai Health System, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-3731-5797
Tony MazzulliDepartment of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Patricio PonceCentro de Investigación en Enfermedades Infecciosas y Vectoriales (CIREV), Instituto Nacional de Investigación en Salud Pública, Quito, Ecuador.
Silvia RestrepoDepartment of Food and Chemical Engineering, Universidad de los Andes, Bogotá, Colombia.
John M GonzálezGrupo de Ciencias Básicas Médicas, School of Medicine, Universidad de los Andes, Bogotá, Colombia.
Adriana BernalLaboratory of Molecular Interactions of Agricultural Microbes (LIMMA), Department of Biological Sciences, Universidad de Los Andes, Bogotá, Colombia.
Marcela Guevara-SuarezApplied genomics research group, Vicerrectoría de Investigación y Creación, Universidad de los Andes, Bogotá, Colombia.
Keith PardeeLeslie Dan Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Varsovia E CevallosCentro de Investigación en Enfermedades Infecciosas y Vectoriales (CIREV), Instituto Nacional de Investigación en Salud Pública, Quito, Ecuador.
Camila GonzálezCentro de Investigaciones en Microbiología y Parasitología Tropical (CIMPAT), Department of Biological Sciences, Universidad de los Andes, Bogotá, Colombia.ORCID 0000-0001-8089-4056
Rod BremnerLunenfeld Tanenbaum Research Institute, Mt Sinai Hospital, Sinai Health System, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-9184-7212
Universidad de Los Andes · COUniversity of Toronto · CAInstituto Nacional de Investigación en Salud Pública · ECUniversity Health Network · CAUniversity of Waterloo · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Continued waves, new variants, and limited vaccine deployment mean that SARS-CoV-2 tests remain vital to constrain the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Affordable, point-of-care (PoC) tests allow rapid screening in non-medical settings. Reverse-transcription loop-mediated isothermal amplification (RT-LAMP) is an appealing approach. A crucial step is to optimize testing in low/medium resource settings. Here, we optimized RT-LAMP for SARS-CoV-2 and human β-actin, and tested clinical samples in multiple countries. "TTTT" linker primers did not improve performance, and while guanidine hydrochloride, betaine and/or Igepal-CA-630 enhanced detection of synthetic RNA, only the latter two improved direct assays on nasopharygeal samples. With extracted clinical RNA, a 20 min RT-LAMP assay was essentially as sensitive as RT-PCR. With raw Canadian nasopharygeal samples, sensitivity was 100% (95% CI: 67.6% - 100%) for those with RT-qPCR Ct values ≤ 25, and 80% (95% CI: 58.4% - 91.9%) for those with 25 < Ct ≤ 27.2. Highly infectious, high titer cases were also detected in Colombian and Ecuadorian labs. We further demonstrate the utility of replacing thermocyclers with a portable PoC device (FluoroPLUM). These combined PoC molecular and hardware tools may help to limit community transmission of SARS-CoV-2.

Indexed as

COVID-19SARS-CoV-2CanadaHumansMolecular Diagnostic TechniquesNucleic Acid Amplification TechniquesPoint-of-Care SystemsRNA, ViralSensitivity and SpecificityRNA, Viral

Identifiers

PMID35544541
PMCPMC9094544
OpenAlexW4280571008

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.