Trial reportPloS one2022
Phase II trial of nafamostat mesilate/gemcitabin/S-1 for unresectable pancreatic cancer.
Trial report in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Prognostic stratification of unresectable locally advanced pancreatic cancer using a combination of inflammatory and nutritional indices: a retrospective cohort study.Surgery today · 2026Article
- Article
- Selection bias due to delayed comprehensive genomic profiling in Japan.Cancer science · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo assess the efficacy of combination chemotherapy with nafamostat mesilate, gemcitabine and S-1 for unresectable pancreatic cancer patients. MATERIALS AND
methodsThe study was conducted as a single-arm, single center, institutional review board-approved phase II trial. Patients received nafamosntat mesilate (4.8 mg/kg continuous transregional arterial infusion) with gemcitabine (1000 mg/m2 transvenous) on days 1 and15, and with oral S-1 [(80 mg/day (BSA<1.25 m2), 100 mg/day (1.25 ≤ BSA<1.5 m2), or 120 mg/day (BSA ≥1.5 m2)] on days 1-14 or, days 1-7 and 15-21. This regimen was repeated at 28-day intervals.
resultsForty-seven evaluable patients (Male/Female: 31/16, Age (median): 66 (range 35-78) yrs, Stage III/IV 10/37.) were candidates in this study. Two patients in stage III (20%) could undergo conversion surgery. Twenty-four patients (51%) underwent subsequent treatment (1st line/ 2nd line / 4th line, 13/ 10/ 1, FOLFIRINOX: 12, GEM/nab-PTX: 18, TAS-118: 3, chemoradiation with S-1: 2, GEM/Erlotinib: 1, nal-IRI: 1, surgery: 2). Median PFS and OS were 9.7 (95% CI, 8.9-14.7 mo) and 14.2 months (99% CI, 13.3-23.9 mo), respectively. Median PFS in stage IV patients was 9.2 months (95% CI, 8.4-12.0 mo). Median OS in patients without subsequent treatment was 10.8 months (95% CI, 9.1-13.8 mo). Median OS in patients with subsequent treatment was 19.3 months (95% CI, 18.9-31.9 mo). Grade 4 treatment-related hematological toxicities were encountered in 7 patients. Two patients developed grade 3 allergic reaction after 6 cycles or later. No febrile neutropenia has been observed.
conclusionNAM/GEM/S-1 therapy is safe and could be promising option for unresectable pancreatic cancer, especially for stage IV cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.