Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35544518›Full record

ArticlePloS one2022

Training a spiking neuronal network model of visual-motor cortex to play a virtual racket-ball game using reinforcement learning.

Haroon Anwar, Simon Caby, Salvador Dura-Bernal, David D'Onofrio, Daniel Hasegan, Matt Deible, Sara Grunblatt, George L Chadderdon, Cliff C Kerr, Peter Lakatos and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. A spiking neural network for active efficient coding.Frontiers in robotics and AI · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Haroon AnwarCenter for Biomedical Imaging and Neuromodulation, Nathan Kline Institute for Psychiatric Research, Orangeburg, New York, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-3079-4812
Simon CabyCenter for Biomedical Imaging and Neuromodulation, Nathan Kline Institute for Psychiatric Research, Orangeburg, New York, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-0057-1060
Salvador Dura-BernalCenter for Biomedical Imaging and Neuromodulation, Nathan Kline Institute for Psychiatric Research, Orangeburg, New York, United States of America.
David D'OnofrioCenter for Biomedical Imaging and Neuromodulation, Nathan Kline Institute for Psychiatric Research, Orangeburg, New York, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-9665-4401
Daniel HaseganCenter for Biomedical Imaging and Neuromodulation, Nathan Kline Institute for Psychiatric Research, Orangeburg, New York, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-2274-2999
Matt DeibleUniversity of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-7494-4555
Sara GrunblattCenter for Biomedical Imaging and Neuromodulation, Nathan Kline Institute for Psychiatric Research, Orangeburg, New York, United States of America.
George L ChadderdonDept. Physiology & Pharmacology, State University of New York Downstate, Brooklyn, New York, United States of America.
Cliff C KerrDept Physics, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Peter LakatosCenter for Biomedical Imaging and Neuromodulation, Nathan Kline Institute for Psychiatric Research, Orangeburg, New York, United States of America.
William W LyttonDept. Physiology & Pharmacology, State University of New York Downstate, Brooklyn, New York, United States of America.
Hananel HazanDept of Biology, Tufts University, Medford, Massachusetts, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-1446-1628
Samuel A NeymotinCenter for Biomedical Imaging and Neuromodulation, Nathan Kline Institute for Psychiatric Research, Orangeburg, New York, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-3646-5195

Funding

Cortical and thalamic mechanisms of selective auditory attentionR01DC012947 · NIDCD · NATHAN S. KLINE INSTITUTE FOR PSYCH RES · PI NEYMOTIN, SAMUEL A, SCHROEDER, CHARLES E · 2013 to 2022
$5.2M
Microconnectomics of neocortex: a multiscale computer modelU01EB017695 · NIBIB · SUNY DOWNSTATE MEDICAL CENTER · PI LYTTON, WILLIAM W · 2014 to 2017
$2.3M
Dissemination of a tool for data-driven multiscale modeling of brain circuitsU24EB028998 · NIBIB · SUNY DOWNSTATE MEDICAL CENTER · PI DURA-BERNAL, SALVADOR · 2019 to 2023
$1.6M
NIBIB NIH HHS U01 EB017695NIBIB NIH HHS U24 EB028998NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC012947
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent models of spiking neuronal networks have been trained to perform behaviors in static environments using a variety of learning rules, with varying degrees of biological realism. Most of these models have not been tested in dynamic visual environments where models must make predictions on future states and adjust their behavior accordingly. The models using these learning rules are often treated as black boxes, with little analysis on circuit architectures and learning mechanisms supporting optimal performance. Here we developed visual/motor spiking neuronal network models and trained them to play a virtual racket-ball game using several reinforcement learning algorithms inspired by the dopaminergic reward system. We systematically investigated how different architectures and circuit-motifs (feed-forward, recurrent, feedback) contributed to learning and performance. We also developed a new biologically-inspired learning rule that significantly enhanced performance, while reducing training time. Our models included visual areas encoding game inputs and relaying the information to motor areas, which used this information to learn to move the racket to hit the ball. Neurons in the early visual area relayed information encoding object location and motion direction across the network. Neuronal association areas encoded spatial relationships between objects in the visual scene. Motor populations received inputs from visual and association areas representing the dorsal pathway. Two populations of motor neurons generated commands to move the racket up or down. Model-generated actions updated the environment and triggered reward or punishment signals that adjusted synaptic weights so that the models could learn which actions led to reward. Here we demonstrate that our biologically-plausible learning rules were effective in training spiking neuronal network models to solve problems in dynamic environments. We used our models to dissect the circuit architectures and learning rules most effective for learning. Our model shows that learning mechanisms involving different neural circuits produce similar performance in sensory-motor tasks. In biological networks, all learning mechanisms may complement one another, accelerating the learning capabilities of animals. Furthermore, this also highlights the resilience and redundancy in biological systems.

Indexed as

Motor CortexVisual CortexAction PotentialsAnimalsComputer SimulationModels, NeurologicalNeurons

Identifiers

PMID35544518
PMCPMC9094569

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.