Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35544466›Full record

ArticlePloS one2022

Emergency care of sepsis in sub-Saharan Africa: Mortality and non-physician clinician management of sepsis in rural Uganda from 2010 to 2019.

Brian Rice, Sal Calo, John Bosco Kamugisha, Nicholas Kamara, Stacey Chamberlain, Global Emergency Care Investigator Study Group

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Observational
  7. Differences in quality indicators of emergency care between on- and off-hours at Ghanaian district hospitals.African journal of emergency medicine : Revue africaine de la medecine d'urgence · 2025
    Article
  8. Perceptions, availability and use of vasopressors for septic shock in emergency care settings in Tanzania.African journal of emergency medicine : Revue africaine de la medecine d'urgence · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Brian RiceDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-9093-1831
Sal CaloDepartment of Emergency Medicine and Center for Global Health, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-1991-8685
John Bosco KamugishaGlobal Emergency Care, United States of America.
Nicholas KamaraKaroli Lwanga Hospital, Nyakibale, Uganda.
Stacey ChamberlainGlobal Emergency Care, United States of America.
Global Emergency Care Investigator Study Group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionLittle data exists from sub-Saharan Africa describing incidence and outcomes of sepsis in emergency units and uncertainty exists surrounding optimal management of sepsis in low-income settings. There exists limited data regarding quality care metrics for non-physician clinicians trained in emergency care. The objective of this study was to describe changes in septic patients over time and evaluate associations between sepsis care and mortality.

methodsSecondary analysis of a prospective cohort of all consecutive patients seen from 2010-2019 in a rural Ugandan emergency unit staffed by non-physician clinicians was performed using an electronic database based on paper charts. Sepsis was defined as suspected infection with a quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score (qSOFA)≥1. Multi-variable logistic regression was used to analyze three-day mortality.

resultsOverall, 48,653 patient visits from 2010-2019 yielded 17,490 encounters for patients age≥18 who had suspected infection, including 10,437 with sepsis. The annual proportion of patients with sepsis decreased from 45.0%% to 21.3% and the proportion with malarial sepsis decreased from 17.7% to 2.1% during the study period. Rates of septic patients receiving quality care ("both fluids and anti-infectives") increased over time (21.2% in 2012 to 32.0% in 2019, p<0.001), but mortality did not significantly improve (4.5% in 2012 to 6.4% in 2019, p = 0.50). The increasing quality of non-physician clinician care was not associated with reduced mortality, and treatment with "both fluids and antibiotics" was associated with increased mortality (RR = 1.55, 95%CI 1.10-2.00).

conclusionThe largest study of sepsis management and outcomes ever published in both Uganda and sub-Saharan Africa showed sepsis and malarial sepsis decreasing from 2010 to 2019. The increasing quality of non-physician clinician care did not significantly reduce mortality and treatment with "both fluids and antibiotics" increased mortality. With causal associations between antibiotics and mortality deemed implausible, associations between sepsis mortality and interventions likely represent confounding by indication. Defining optimal sepsis care regionally will likely require randomized controlled trials.

Indexed as

Organ Dysfunction ScoresSepsisAdolescentAnti-Bacterial AgentsEmergency Service, HospitalHospital MortalityHumansProspective StudiesRetrospective StudiesUgandaAnti-Bacterial Agents

Identifiers

PMID35544466
PMCPMC9094533

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.