Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35544287›Full record

ArticleThe American journal of clinical nutrition2022

Visceral, subcutaneous, and total fat mass accumulation in a prospective cohort of adolescents.

Amanda E Staiano, Peter T Katzmarzyk

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The American journal of clinical nutrition, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02784509 (Translational Investigation of Growth and Everyday Routines in Kids), which is not on this map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02784509 completednot on this map

Translational Investigation of Growth and Everyday Routines in Kids (TIGER Kids)

TypeobservationalSponsorPennington Biomedical Research CenterRan2016 to 2020Enrolled342ConditionsChildhood Obesity
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Amanda E StaianoPennington Biomedical Research Center, Baton Rouge, LA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7846-046X
Peter T KatzmarzykPennington Biomedical Research Center, Baton Rouge, LA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9280-6022
Pennington Biomedical Research Center · US

Funding

Tracking & Evaluation CoreU54GM104940 · NIGMS · LSU PENNINGTON BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH CTR · PI JUDD E SHELLITO · 2012 to 2026
$69.1M
Research BaseP30DK072476 · NIDDK · LSU PENNINGTON BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH CTR · PI Sujoy Ghosh · 2005 to 2026
$26.5M
NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK072476NIGMS NIH HHS U54 GM104940
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRace and sex differences in adolescents' body fat are demonstrated in cross-sectional cohorts, yet a longitudinal design would better identify patterns of fat distribution over time.

objectivesThe aim was to examine race and sex differences in adiposity between black and white adolescents over 2 y.

methodsA cohort of adolescents aged 10-16 y (38% black; 52% girls; 15% overweight, 34% with obesity) underwent body composition measurements at baseline (n = 309) and 2 y later (n = 236), using DXA to quantify whole-body fat mass (FM) and MRI for abdominal subcutaneous (SAT) and visceral adipose tissue (VAT) volumes. General linear models were used to examine race and sex differences in log-transformed FM, SAT, and VAT, adjusting for age, sexual maturation, extended BMI percentile, and race-by-sex interaction. SAT and VAT models in addition controlled for baseline FM and change in FM (for change models).

resultsMean (95% CI) baseline FM (kg) was higher among white [18.5 (17.9, 19.2) than among black adolescents [17.4 (16.6, 18.2), P = 0.03] and girls [19.5 (18.8, 20.3) than boys [16.5 (15.8, 17.2), P < 0.0001]. Mean (95% CI) baseline SAT (L) was higher among girls [4.4 (4.2, 4.6)] than among boys [3.9 (3.7, 4.1), P < 0.0001]. Mean (95% CI) baseline VAT (L) was higher among white [0.5 (0.5, 0.6)] than among black [0.3 (0.3, 0.4)] adolescents (P < 0.0001) and boys [0.5 (0.4, 0.5)] than girls [0.4 (0.4, 0.4), P = 0.04]. Over 2 y mean (95% CI) FM change (kg) was higher among white [3.7 (2.9, 4.5)] than among black adolescents [2.3 (1.3, 3.3), P = 0.04] and girls [4.0 (3.0, 4.9)] than boys [2.0 (1.1, 3.0), P = 0.007], but SAT change (L) did not differ by race or sex. VAT change (L) was higher among white [0.1 (0.1, 0.1)] than among black adolescents [0.0 (0.0, 0.1), P = 0.003] and boys [0.1 (0.1, 0.1)] than girls [0.0 (0.0, 0.1), P = 0.034].

conclusionsSex and race differences in the deposition and accumulation of excess fat are important considerations for understanding obesity prevalence and obesity-related disease risk among adolescents.This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT02784509.

Indexed as

AdiposityIntra-Abdominal FatAdolescentBody Mass IndexCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleObesityProspective StudiesSubcutaneous Fatabdominal fat/diagnostic imagingadipose tissue/anatomy and histologyAfrican Americansectopic fatintra-abdominal fat/diagnostic imaginglongitudinal studiesobesity/ethnologyracial groups/geneticssex characteristics

Identifiers

PMID35544287
PMCPMC9437989
OpenAlexW4280598574

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.