ArticleTurkish journal of anaesthesiology and reanimation2022
A1C as a Prognosticator of Perioperative Complications of Diabetes: A Narrative Review.
Article in Turkish journal of anaesthesiology and reanimation, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Prehabilitation for Patients Undergoing Breast Reduction Surgery: A Scoping Review.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2026Article
- Perioperative screening and management of hyperglycemia: a joint position statement from the Brazilian Diabetes Society (SBD), the Brazilian Society of Anesthesiology (SBA) and the Brazilian Association for the Study of Obesity and Metabolic Syndrome (ABESO).Diabetology & metabolic syndrome · 2026Review
- Lack of Association of A1C With Postoperative Complications in Children With Type 1 or Type 2 Diabetes.Clinical diabetes : a publication of the American Diabetes Association · 2024Article
- A Systematic Guideline by the ASPN Workgroup on the Evidence, Education, and Treatment Algorithm for Painful Diabetic Neuropathy: SWEET.Journal of pain research · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hemoglobin A1c (A1C) or glycated hemoglobin reflects the levels of blood glucose during the previous 8-12 weeks duration. It also helps us to diagnose diabetes in some cases, during the preoperative screening, who were initially missed out. Although the number of patients with diabetes undergoing various surgeries has increased many times, the role of A1C as a predictor for the complications during the perioperative phase remains intriguing. This could be due to various factors such as lack of best shreds of evidence, various cut-off levels of target A1C, variations of the patient population, presence of other comorbid conditions, and so on. This narrative review article presents the role of A1C as a reflector of perioperative adverse events in various surgeries and discusses the controversies surrounding it. We searched "PubMed Central" database with search criteria of "hemoglobin A1c, glycated hemoglobin, and perioperative complications" with publication date from January 01, 2010, to January 31, 2020, and found a total of 214 articles. We included only the relevant articles to our topic and added a few more articles that we found as "secondary references" from those articles to suit the structured headings of our narrative review and made it a total of fifty. To our knowledge, the majority of the studies published on this topic are of the "Retrospective analysis" type of study, besides no narrative review article available to date in the literature. We suggest that assessment of A1C levels preoperatively can be used as a routine practice for major procedures in patients with diabetes and for patients who have persistent high glucose values during preoperative screening regardless of whether a diagnosis of diabetes is established or not. We found that a cut-off of 8% is acceptable for the majority of the surgical procedures. However, it is better to have a cut-off of 7% or lower for procedures such as spine and joint replacement surgeries, cardiac surgeries, and so on. Further prospective studies involving a large population preferably with a multicenter design would provide us more clarity on this topic.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.