Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35544130›Full record

Trial reportJAMA surgery2022

Clinical Impact of Intraoperative Margin Assessment in Breast-Conserving Surgery With a Novel Pegulicianine Fluorescence-Guided System: A Nonrandomized Controlled Trial.

E Shelley Hwang, Peter Beitsch, Peter Blumencranz, David Carr, Anees Chagpar, Lynne Clark, Nayana Dekhne, Daleela Dodge, Donna L Dyess, Linsey Gold and 7 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readControlled Clinical TrialMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03321929 (Feasibility Study Phase C), which is not on this map. Cited by 34 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03321929 phase2completednot on this map

Feasibility Study Phase C: Expansion Into Multiple Institutions for Training in the Use of the LUM Imaging System for Intraoperative Detection of Residual Cancer in the Tumor Bed of Female Subjects With Breast Cancer

TypeinterventionalSponsorLumicell, Inc.Ran2018 to 2020Enrolled234ConditionsBreast CancerArmsLUM Imaging System
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Interim Phase II Results Using Panitumumab-IRDye800CW during Transoral Robotic Surgery in Patients with Oropharyngeal Cancer.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2024
    Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Erasable FAP Targeted Spray-On Probe for Fluorescence-Guided Surgery.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 16 institutions in 1 country.

E Shelley HwangDuke Cancer Institute and Duke University Health System, Durham, North Carolina.
Peter BeitschDallas Surgical Group, Dallas, Texas.
Peter BlumencranzThe Comprehensive Breast Care Center, BayCare Medical Group, Clearwater, Florida.
David CarrNovant Health, Winston-Salem, North Carolina.
Anees ChagparYale-New Haven Hospital, New Haven, Connecticut.
Lynne ClarkCHI Franciscan, Tacoma, Washington.
Nayana DekhneBeaumont Hospital, Royal Oak, Michigan.
Daleela DodgePenn State Health, Hershey, Pennsylvania.
Donna L DyessMitchell Cancer Institute, University of South Alabama, Mobile.
Linsey GoldBeaumont Hospital, Troy, Michigan.
Stephen GrobmyerCleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio.
Kelly HuntMD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Stephen KarpBeth Israel Lahey Health, Burlington, Massachusetts.
Beth-Ann LesnikoskiBaptist MD Anderson, Jacksonville, Florida.
Irene WapnirStanford Healthcare, Palo Alto, California.
Barbara L SmithMassachusetts General Hospital, Boston.
INSITE study team
Baptist Medical Center Jacksonville · USBayCare Health System · USBeaumont Hospital, Royal Oak · USBotsford Hospital · USCleveland Clinic · USDallas Surgical Group · USDuke University Health System · USLahey Medical Center · USMassachusetts General Hospital · USNovant Health · USPenn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center · USStanford Health Care · USThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USUSA Mitchell Cancer Institute · USVirginia Mason Franciscan Health · USYale New Haven Hospital · US

Funding

Yale Clinical and Translational Science Award (U Component)UL1TR001863 · NCATS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI John H. Krystal, LUCILA OHNO-MACHADO · 2016 to 2026
$102.9M
A prospective, multi-center pivotal study of the LUM Imaging System for real-time, in vivo margin assessment in breast conserving surgeryR44CA211013 · NCI · LUMICELL, INC. · PI LEE, W. DAVID · 2016 to 2017
$2.0M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001863NCI NIH HHS R44 CA211013
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Positive margins following breast-conserving surgery (BCS) are often identified on standard pathology evaluation. Intraoperative assessment of the lumpectomy cavity has the potential to reduce residual disease or reexcision rate following standard of care BCS in real time. Objective: To collect safety and initial efficacy data on the novel pegulicianine fluorescence-guided system (pFGS) when used to identify residual cancer in the tumor bed of female patients undergoing BCS. Design, Setting, and Participants: This prospective single-arm open-label study was conducted as a nonrandomized multicenter controlled trial at 16 academic or community breast centers across the US. Female patients 18 years and older with newly diagnosed primary invasive breast cancer or ductal carcinoma in situ DCIS undergoing BCS were included, excluding those with previous breast cancer surgery and a history of dye allergies. Of 283 consecutive eligible patients recruited, 234 received a pegulicianine injection and were included in the safety analysis; of these, 230 were included in the efficacy analysis. Patients were enrolled between February 6, 2018, and April 10, 2020, and monitored for a 30-day follow-up period. Data were analyzed from April 10, 2020, to August 5, 2021. Interventions: Participants received an injection of a novel imaging agent (pegulicianine) a mean (SD) of 3.2 (0.9) hours prior to surgery at a dose of 1 mg/kg. After completing standard of care (SOC) excision, pFGS was used to scan the lumpectomy cavity to guide the removal of additional shave margins. Main Outcomes and Measures: Adverse events and sensitivity, specificity, and reexcision rate. Results: Of 234 female patients enrolled (median [IQR] age, 62.0 [55.0-69.0] years), 230 completed the trial and 1 patient with a history of allergy to contrast agents had an anaphylactic reaction and recovered without sequelae. Correlation of pFGS with final margin status on a per-margin analysis showed a marked improvement in sensitivity over standard pathology assessment of the main lumpectomy specimen (69.4% vs 38.2%, respectively). On a per-patient level, the false-negative rate of pFGS was 23.7% (9 of 38), and sensitivity was 76.3% (29 of 38). Among 32 patients who underwent excision of pFGS-guided shaves, pFGS averted the need for reexcision in 6 (19%). Conclusions and Relevance: In this pilot feasibility study, the safety profile of pegulicianine was consistent with other imaging agents used in BCS, and was associated with a reduced need for second surgery in patients who underwent intraoperative additional excision of pFGS-guided shaves. These findings support further development and clinical performance assessment of pFGS in a prospective randomized trial. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03321929.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsCarcinoma, Ductal, BreastCarcinoma, Intraductal, NoninfiltratingFemaleHumansMargins of ExcisionMastectomy, SegmentalMiddle AgedNeoplasm, ResidualProspective StudiesReoperation

Identifiers

PMID35544130
PMCPMC9096689
OpenAlexW4280546732

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.